Category: Life Insurance


The killing of another American soldier by a purported Afghan ally doesn’t simply add to the grim tally of U.S. troops shot dead by their Afghan counterparts.  It also raises questions about a key aspect of the American plan for gradually winding down the war.

The soldier, who hasn’t yet been identified, wasn’t killed by members of the Afghan army or police, the insurgent-riddled security forces responsible for the overwhelming majority of fratricidal attacks on NATO forces.  Instead, he was killed by a member of the Afghan Local Police, a network of small militias funded – and in some cases armed – by the U.S. to fill the void left behind when American forces withdraw from remote parts of Afghanistan.

The program is central to the Obama administration’s plan for stabilizing Afghanistan as much as possible before withdrawing in 2014, but the attack suggests its members aren’t being properly vetted and overseen.

The program borrows a tactic from Iraq, and is meant to create local fighting forces capable of preventing the Taliban from returning to their former strongholds and keeping a measure of order in areas which are largely beyond the purview the fragile Afghan central government.

The number of fighters in the so-called “Afghan Local Police” initiative is set to more than triple over the next 18 months, rising from roughly 9,800 now to roughly 30,000 by the end of next year.   Top American generals routinely describe it as a cornerstone of their broader strategy for the war.

Speaking to the Senate Armed Services Committee in March 2011, for instance, then-Afghan war commander Gen. David Petraeus called the ALP initiative “arguably the most critical element in our effort to help Afghanistan develop the capability to secure itself.”

The initiative was deeply controversial even before this latest attack.  Last fall, a blistering assessment by Human Rights Watch found that ALP personnel were routinely breaking into houses, using checkpoints to demand bribes from motorists, improperly taxing local residents and arresting – and in some cases killing – local villagers.

“While some community defense force programs have been more successful than others, all have been plagued by failures of vetting and oversight, and, too often, impunity for human rights abuses,” the group concluded.  “The ALP is a high-risk strategy to achieve short-term goals in which local groups are again being armed without adequate oversight or accountability.”

The program’s future will be further called into question if there are more incidents like Monday’s bloody shooting in eastern Afghanistan’s volatile Paktika Province.  NATO officials say a member of an Afghan Local Police unit fired on American soldiers approaching a checkpoint, killing one American.

The Paktika attack came just hours after an Afghan soldier killed two British soldiers at a joint base in Lashkar Gah, a large city in southern Afghanistan.  The three deaths brought the total number of NATO personnel killed this year in so-called “green on blue” attacks to 16.   That makes them the second leading cause of coalition fatalities in 2012, trailing only the 22 troops killed by roadside bombs.

The shootings have been a cause of growing cause of anger throughout Washington and the other coalition capitols, where leading politicians are openly questioning why their troops don’t need to worry about the Taliban remotely as much as they’ve had to worry about the Afghan troops living, patrolling and walking beside them.

Earlier this year, France suspended its training operations inside Afghanistan after four of its soldiers were killed by one of their Afghan counterparts, though Paris later resumed the program.

Top American officials, meanwhile, insist their forces will continue to work alongside Afghan security personnel, but U.S. forces are taking steps which made clear just how big of a trust gap has developed between the two sides.

Speaking to reporters Monday, Gen. John Allen, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, said American troops assigned to small joint bases were changing their sleeping arrangements to ensure that American personnel were constantly monitoring their side of the compound and setting up other internal defenses to prevent Afghans from crossing over to kill U.S. personnel.

Actions speak louder than words, and those are the actions of a nation beginning to pull further away from a nominal ally.

RT @NBCSportsPR: NBC nets 4.8 overnight for final round at Bay Hill; up 129% from last yr and best for Bay Hill since ’09 (4.9) (1 of 2)

RT @jeffzeleny: With Wisconsin primary just around the corner, you’d be wise to start following Craig Gilbert of the Journal Sentinel. H …

KIRKWOOD, Mo. — Because of President Obama’s policies, U.S. troops are “stretched to the breaking point,” Mitt Romney said on Tuesday in criticizing Obama’s handling of the war in Afghanistan.

Appearing in this St. Louis suburb ahead of Missouri’s Saturday caucuses, Romney said Obama’s plan for withdrawal from the country is too expedient and reveals too much information to the Taliban insurgents there. He also said it is wearing down U.S. forces that must go on multiple rotations as colleagues are pulled out of active duty. By contrast, Romney said that, as president, he would increase the military by 100,000 troops.

The former Massachusetts governor confined his remarks on Afghanistan to Obama and did not bring up Sunday’s massacre involving a soldier who is accused of leaving his base in a remote part of southern Afghanistan and shooting Afghan civilians. At least 16 people died, including nine children. Romney, in a rare show of agreement, has taken Obama’s side on the implications of that incident.

Romney also repeated concerns he has made about the declining size of both the Navy and Air Force. When he made similar remarks during a debate in South Carolina earlier this year, the fact-checking website PolitiFact labeled them “Pants on Fire,” the site’s lowest rating for accuracy.

During his speech, Romney also had harsh words for Obama’s handling of Iran. Responding to the president’s assertion on Monday that jitters about the prospect of a military conflict involving Iran — something Obama said has been fueled by GOP presidential candidates’ rhetoric — were the biggest factor behind the recent jump in gasoline prices, Romney said Obama was misguided.

“Frankly, it’s disappointing to have the president of the United States take a serious foreign-policy issue which is Iran, the state sponsor of terror in the world, becoming nuclear, and trying to turn that into saying we’re somehow responsible for high gasoline prices in this country,” Romney said. “It’s a real stretch even for a guy who’s gotten pretty good at making excuses.”

Romney said that if the president was still looking for answers on gas prices, “I have some suggestions for him,” citing the administration’s moratorium on oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, its refusal to open Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and the denial of a permit for the Keystone XL pipeline. Energy experts have said that doing any of those things wouldn’t have any immediate impact at the pump, but Romney said, “Those things affect gasoline prices, long term.”

The Obama campaign issued a swift response, as spokeswoman Lis Smith accused Romney of showing “that he will say anything in the pursuit of political gain.”

“Contrary to Mitt Romney’s rhetoric today, President Obama has aggressively pursued an all-of-the-above energy strategy by approving hundreds of drilling permits in the Gulf of Mexico and making millions of acres available for oil and gas development,” Smith said. “Today, domestic oil and gas production is at an eight-year high and our dependence on foreign oil has hit a 16-year low. Mitt Romney, on the other hand, would continue tax subsidies for oil and gas companies making near-record profits and has opposed fuel-economy standards that will save consumers thousands of dollars at the pump. These misguided policies would do nothing to reduce gas prices or create jobs.”

Upward Bound

Cloud computing could reinvent the way many federal agencies operate.

Sunny Outlook

Cloud vendors and feds are forecasting mostly clear skies for a fast-track security certification process.

GOP presidential candidate Rick Santorum used an early-morning speech to a powerful pro-Israel lobby Tuesday to accuse the Obama administration of taking too soft an approach towards Iran. Hours later, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta took to the same podium to issue an unusually pointed response.

“In this town, it’s easy to talk tough,” Panetta said, in a subtle reference to Republican critics like Santorum. “Acting tough is a hell of a lot more important.” 

Panetta didn’t mention Santorum by name, but he didn’t need to. The comments weren’t in Panetta’s prepared remarks, and his departure from the text — and the language he chose to use — was clearly intended to respond to the GOP candidates.

In his earlier remarks, Santorum told the crowd that the U.S. should destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities if Tehran continued its weapons push and promised that if Iranian leaders “do not tear down those facilities, we will tear them down ourselves.”  The former Pennsylvania senator trained the rest of his fire on Obama, accusing the administration of  being “reticent” Iran and mocking the president’s earlier promise to always stand behind Israel.

“He says he has Israel’s back,” Santorum said. “ From everything I’ve seen from the conduct of this administration, he has turned his back on the people of Israel.”

As one would expect, the comments drew an angry response from Democratic lawmakers like Michigan Senator Carl Levin, who said Santorum was trying to use a vital national security issue to boost his campaign. More interestingly, they also drew a pointed — if veiled — response from Panetta.

unable to retrieve full-text contentAP – He predicted the tech-stock collapse. He foresaw the housing bust.

unable to retrieve full-text contentAP – The Dow Jones industrial average reclaimed the last of the ground it held before the carnage of the Great Recession — bailouts, bank failures, layoffs by the million and a stock market plunge that cut retirement savings in half.

unable to retrieve full-text contentAP – Metals prices jumped Tuesday on expectations that demand may improve after a new Greek bailout package was approved and China took another step to stimulate economic growth.

unable to retrieve full-text contentAP – Egypt’s finance minister says Cairo expects to sign a loan agreement with the International Monetary Fund for $3.2 billion next month.

Powered by WordPress and Motion by 85ideas.