Tag Archive: state


Republican presidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, used Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s appearance before the House Foreign Affairs Committee to ask her about the U.S. apology over the military’s alleged accidental burnings of Korans.

The Koran-burning incident has led to widespread protests and the killing of several Americans — as well as loud criticism from Paul’s GOP nomination rivals over the U.S. apology for it. Rick Santorum said President Obama’s apology to the Afghan government showed weakness and Newt Gingrich said he “surrendered.”

Paul noted that those who have been criticizing this particular apology should recall that previous presidents have apologized for similar incidents, and indirectly referenced President George W. Bush’s 2009 apology to Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki for an American sniper’s use of a copy of the religious text for target practice.

Bringing up the scandal provoked by a viral video depicting American Marines urinating on Taliban corpses, Paul voiced his overall opposition to the war that created thousands of refugees in the country.

“Does it ever get to the point where apologizing about the Koran is rather minor, considering some of the other problems we have created in [Afghanistan]?” Paul asked.

Clinton said she appreciated Paul’s measured comments about Obama and other presidents offering apologies “when we are deeply sorry for unfortunate incidents that occur, that were not intentional, and which we know have emotional resonance with people.”

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Tuesday on the Fiscal 2013 Budget and priorities for diplomacy.

Clinton argued for $51.6 billion in funding for the diplomatic department. Defending the figure, she said it “represents an increase of less than the rate of inflation and just over 1 percent of the federal budget.”

Clinton referenced the State workers engaged in economic diplomacy in her opening statement, saying that the “more than 1,000 State Department economic officers” are fighting against “corruption, red tape, favoritism, distorted currencies, and intellectual property theft” abroad. She called USAID and State employees overseas “the bravest people I’ve ever met.”

“Working with them is one of the greatest honors I’ve had in public life,” Clinton said.

The budget request would go also toward using technology in State’s activities. The technology, she said, is “updating diplomacy and development for the 21st century.”

Watch:

President Obama on Tuesday signed an executive order establishing a center to coordinate federal trade law enforcement efforts.

The Interagency Trade Enforcement Center will work with the Agriculture, Commerce, Homeland Security, Justice, State and Treasury departments, as well as the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to ensure U.S. businesses and workers are protected from unfair trade practices. It will reside in the U.S. Trade Representative’s office, the executive order stated.

“Robust monitoring and enforcement of U.S. rights under international trade agreements, and enforcement of domestic trade laws, are crucial to expanding exports and ensuring U.S. workers, businesses, ranchers and farmers are able to compete on a level playing field with foreign trade partners,” Obama wrote.

The president called for a unit to investigate trade violations as part of his State of the Union address in late January. “I will not stand by when our competitors don’t play by the rules,” he said at the time.

Obama requested $26 million for the center as part of his fiscal 2013 budget, according to a Commerce Department summary.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Friday pledged $10 million to enhance humanitarian efforts in Syria, denouncing the escalating bloodshed at the hands of President Bashar al-Assad as an “appalling humanitarian disaster.”

Conditions on the ground in Syria are dire and getting worse, Clinton said in Tunisia at the first meeting of Friends of Syria, a gathering of more than 60 countries and international organizations.

“Emergency assistance is desperately needed, but the regime is doing everything it can to prevent aid from reaching those who need it. It is going after aid workers, doctors, and journalists reporting on the suffering,” Clinton said. “We cannot wait for this crisis to become an even greater catastrophe.”

The influx of U.S. funds to “quickly scale up” humanitarian efforts will help support makeshift medical facilities, train emergency medical staff, and get clean water, food, blankets, heaters, and hygiene kits to Syrian civilians in need, Clinton said.

“This is not the end,” Clinton said. “The United States will provide more humanitarian support in coming days.”

The Friends of Syria group has demanded an immediate cease-fire so aid can be delivered to Syrians struggling under Assad’s crackdown, especially in the city of Homs.

Meanwhile, back in Washington, President Obama said he was encouraged by the Friends of Syria meeting and promised the U.S. would “keep the pressure up, and look for every tool available to prevent the slaughter of innocents in Syria.”

“It is important that we not be bystanders during these extraordinary events,” Obama said alongside the Danish prime minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt who was visiting Washington.

Clinton called upon her dozens of counterparts from Arab and European nations to increase the pressure on the Assad regime and send a clear message that Syria will “pay a heavy cost” for ignoring the will of the international community and violating its peoples’ human rights. Clinton called for each country to impose travel bans on senior members of the Assad government — as the Arab League has done — and freeze their assets, boycott Syrian oil, suspend new investments, and consider closing embassies and consulates. 

Clinton had a message to Syrians who support Assad, singling out members of the Syrian military in particular.

“Understand that this regime has no future,” Clinton said. “The longer you carry out its campaign of violence, the more it will stain your honor. But if you refuse to take part in attacks on your fellow citizens, your countrymen will hail you as heroes.”

A group of senators, including Armed Services Committee ranking member John McCain, R-Ariz., hailed the Friends of Syria meeting as a “welcome forum” to isolate Assad and his defenders and supporters in Russia, China, and Iran. Still, the senators said the speeches and meetings won’t stop the bloodshed, and they called for the United States to provide the Syrian opposition with access to weapons, tactical intelligence, communications equipment, financing, and medical supplies.

“We remain deeply concerned that our international diplomacy risks becoming divorced from the reality on the ground in Syria, which is now an armed conflict between Assad’s forces and the people of Syria who are struggling to defend themselves against indiscriminate attacks,” said McCain in a statement along with Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Joe Lieberman, ID-Conn. “What is needed urgently are tangible actions by the community of responsible nations to ensure that the Syrian people have the means to protect themselves against their attackers…. We should also explore measures that can be taken to disrupt Assad’s ability to command and control his forces.”

Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister, Prince Saud al-Faisal, said it was “an excellent idea” to arm Syria’s opposition so that it can protect itself.

A joint Defense and Treasury report set to be released Wednesday afternoon recommends that states adopt practices such as providing temporary professional licenses or endorsing outside certifications to help ease the burden of licensure requirements for military spouses.

The report is the latest from the Obama administration’s Joining Forces initiative, an effort spearheaded by First Lady Michelle Obama and Jill Biden to combine the assets of many agencies and private sector groups to support military members, veterans and families.

Because military spouses move from state to state more often than the general population, those who work in professions that require state licenses – 35 percent of military spouses in the work force, — “bear disproportionately high financial and administrative burdens,” the report’s summary said.

Many states already have passed legislation in line with the report’s recommendations and 13 have similar legislative proposals on tap.

The best practices Joining Forces identified are having states endorse current professional licenses from other states, or providing provisional credentials to military spouses so they can begin to work right after their active duty partner is relocated while applying for certification in their new state.

Many fields that require professional licensing, such as teaching, child care services and nursing, already have endorsement policies when a professional moves to a new state. The problem, according to Marcus Beauregard, state liaison for the Defense Department’s office of military community and family policy, is that those states also require recent work experience in order to endorse outside certifications.

“That was difficult for many military spouses who may not have been able to work in their specialty and could not find employment in that specialty,” he said. Military spouses are 10 times more likely to have moved across state lines in the last year than their civilian counterparts, according to the report.

As a possible solution, state lawmakers in Colorado suggested adding a continuing education component, rather than proof of recent experience, Beauregard said.

Providing temporary or provisional professional licenses to military spouses so they can work while fulfilling requirements for a license in a new state is key, the report said. Spouses often have about two to three years in any location, Beauregard said. It can take as long as six months to get a license.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey are scheduled to join the first lady and Jill Biden Wednesday in announcing the report’s findings and urging all 50 states to pass legislation on the issue by 2014.

Joining Forces emphasized in a conference call with reporters Tuesday that this is a state issue. “Eliminating licensing concerns has been among top issues DoD presents to states each year,” Beauregard said.

The Pentagon created a Facebook page for military spouses last summer and began to highlight its efforts to push states to consider changing licensing rules through its state liaison and education opportunity office.

Beauregard acknowledged that there can be an initial reluctance on the part of many state lawmakers to adopt such provisions, often based on perception or bureaucratic loopholes.

“The [state] legislators are having to approach not just a single entity but a number of different entities and show that this is not going to harm their standards, this is not going to dilute their ability to maintain the public safety,” Beauregard said.

Other suggestions highlighted in the report targeted those concerns, aiming to expedite application procedures, such as granting the licensing official for the state authority to approve applications for the professional boards.

President Obama on Monday requested $43.4 billion for the core budget of the State Department and U.S. Agency for International Development for fiscal year 2013, with an additional $8.2 billion in a separate “overseas contingencies operations” account for civilian-led missions and programs in frontline states such as Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.

The total $51.6 billion in discretionary funding is an increase of only 1.6 percent — or $800 million — over the 2012 enacted level, including the costs of the Overseas Contingency Operations resources.

The increase is especially slight considering the State Department’s growing responsibilities in frontline states now that U.S. troops have left Iraq and are slated to draw down in Afghanistan. As it did for the first time last year, the State Department requested some of its money for operations in those countries within OCO, a separate wartime funds account in conjunction with the Defense Department.

Obama requested $4.8 billion for the civilian-led missions in Iraq. Of this, about $1.8 billion would go toward funding police training and military-assistance programs transitioned from the Defense Department. Another $2.7 billion in operations funding would largely support the embassy — which has swelled to about 16,000 diplomats and contractors in Baghdad — and three consulates. All told, State’s Iraq funds are approximately 10 percent less than the current fiscal-year level. For its part, the Defense Department requested only $2.9 billion for Iraq-related costs in 2013.

The State Department requested $4.6 billion for projects in Afghanistan, where Obama has pledged to bring the remaining “surge” troops back home no later than September. Of that, $2.5 billion is slated for counterterrorism-related programs, reconciliation and reintegration efforts, and other assistance. An additional $2.1 billion supports the expansion of the diplomatic and interagency presence there, and public-diplomacy programs. With about 68,000 U.S. troops still expected to be in Afghanistan next fall, the Pentagon requested $85.6 billion for its operations there in 2013.

Pick Your Avatar

Federal cybersecurity workers might not be far from being able to access top-notch training directly from their computer desktops.

Robert Hollingsworth, director of the security engineering and computer security training division at the State Department’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security Training Center, told Wired Workplace on Thursday that State and the Homeland Security Department have begun training federal cyber pros using virtual worlds, where each user has an avatar and is walked through different cyber scenarios.

The virtual worlds courses are part of the Federal Cybersecurity Training Event, or FedCTE, a joint program between State and DHS. The program started in 2008, after the Obama administration’s Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative identified a need for addressing cybersecurity training and education within the federal workforce. FedCTE courses also were developed using the specific cybersecurity roles identified by the National Initiative on Cybersecurity Education, Hollingsworth said.

Thus far, the virtual worlds program has trained more than 243 students from 68 agencies on cybersecurity topics like cyber protection, response and mitigation, Hollingsworth said. “The demand is going through the roof,” he said. “It’s a way for these remote programs to address these cybersecurity areas and be continually modified as vulnerabilities are discovered and new security practices are identified. Even previously trained people can address new concerns in a timely fashion.”

Still, Hollingsworth noted that one challenge for government is simply defining the roles, requirements and job tasks needed for federal cybersecurity work. But a goal of the virtual training is to help overcome that hurdle, he added. “We’re finding there are a lot of roles and responsibilities that may be unique to a department, and we can go in and customize those portions and touch those individual job descriptions and tweak it,” he said. “That would be too hard to do in a real classroom every time, but it’s not too hard to adjust these virtual modules.”

Going forward, Hollingsworth said the program will continue to expand to include more cybersecurity workers, particularly as it gets more popular through word of mouth. “It’s in the ground floor now, but we feel it’s going to be mainstreamed and that this form of training will become more of a normal activity for federal security workers,” he said. “It will be on their desktops at some point and they can train as needed. It’s another tool in their toolbox.”

The State Department energy specialists in the eye of the political storm over the proposed Keystone XL pipeline conducted themselves with objectivity as they communicated with the relevant companies and the Canadian government, State’s inspector general said in a report made public Friday.

The IG, however, questioned whether State possesses the requisite technical expertise for approving a major energy project that has become a partisan issue in the debate over the environment and how to create jobs.

State deputy IG Harold Geisel was tasked by lawmakers with evaluating the legality of the communication between State officials and TransCanada (the company hoping to build the pipeline that would stretch 1,700 miles from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico) in selecting the contractor Cardno Entrix to perform the required environmental impact study. Legislators questioned whether TransCanada and some State employees had financial relationships with the contractor and whether State adequately consulted other government entities such as the Environmental Protection Agency.

The IG “found no evidence that TransCanada had improperly influenced the department’s selection of Cardno Entrix as the Keystone XL EIS third-party contractor,” the report said. The final impact statement “generally addressed and incorporated the views and concerns of federal agencies with expertise,” it said.

“However, some concerns, such as the manner in which alternative routes were considered . . . were not completely incorporated. . . and the department’s limited technical resources, expertise and experience impacted the implementation” of the National Environmental Policy Act process.

Geisel recommended that two State bureaus redesign the process for selecting third-party contractors to maximize the department’s control. And he recommended hiring a civil servant with experience in NEPA impact statements.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who requested the report in November 2011 along with Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., said in a statement, “the findings confirm once again why the project should not be rubber-stamped for approval, despite efforts by Republicans in Congress to do just that.”

The officers in charge of the review, he added, quoting the report, “had `little or no’ experience with environmental law ‘and had to seek training and learn quickly on the job.’ ”

Elizabeth Heyd, a blogger for the Natural Resources Defense Council, welcomed the report but expressed skepticism toward the process, saying State had “muddied the water” as to who was in charge of gauging potential environmental damage from the project.

“In a procedure that many would liken to the fox guarding the chicken coop, the applicant for a project, in this case, TransCanada, presented the reviewing agency with its choices for contracting out the review,” she wrote. “The IG report explained that that practice has evolved because the applicant pays for the contractor and because this allows reviews to be processed more quickly.”

Asked to comment, Jeff Ostermayer, spokesman for the National Association of Manufacturers, said: “We believe that the Keystone XL project is in the national interest of the country and will create thousands of jobs and provide an affordable source of energy for manufacturers. We are continuing to advocate for the approval of the pipeline.”

The State Department is vociferously pushing back against what it called “funky” reports that the U.S. plans to cut the size of its diplomatic presence in Baghdad by as much as half because of security concerns and ongoing tensions with the increasingly authoritarian government.

“Contrary to some of the news reports, we are not reducing our operations by 50 percent,” Thomas Nides, deputy secretary of State for management and resources, told reporters on a conference call Wednesday. “But, quite frankly, I am hopeful that over the next few months we will be able to reduce our size by reducing our dependency on contractors…. We owe it to the taxpayers.”

The New York Times reported on Tuesday that the U.S. was preparing to cut down the size and scope of the embassy in Baghdad — where 16,000 diplomats and contractors are stationed — by half because of security concerns and tussling with Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki.  Nides said he doesn’t know “where the 50 percent number came from, but it is what it is.”

State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland blasted the “wild guesstimates” in a “couple of funky pieces” about the reductions in personnel. “To the degree to which there may be a reduction in the diplomatic personnel, it’ll be modest,” she told reporters during a briefing on Wednesday.

The assessment of how to create a more “normalized embassy presence” since the last American troops pulled out of the country in December will continue well into this year, Nides said. Going contract by contract to determine what goods the U.S. can purchase locally — as opposed to bringing them in from over the border — will dramatically reduce dependency on contractors, he added.

Another way to trim expenses is to consolidate some of the locations and spaces the diplomatic presence actually needs, and rely more on local Iraqi contractors, Nides said. The number of security guards is “a total derivative” of the square footage they need to protect, he noted. 

A day earlier, Nuland dismissed the complaints featured in the Times article about how “life became more difficult” for the thousands of diplomats and contractors after the last American troops pulled out in December. After convoys were delayed at border crossings, the Times reported that “within days, the salad bar at the embassy dining hall ran low. Sometimes there was no sugar or Splenda for coffee. On chicken-wing night, wings were rationed at six per person.”

Nuland said on Tuesday she did not consider an insufficient amount of arugula at the salad bar to necessarily constitute a hardship in Iraq. “Frankly, I saw that story,” Nuland said, “and it looked like some, some whingeing that was inappropriate… on the part of embassy employees, with regard to the quality of the salad bar.”

In a significant shift, the State Department is cutting by half the cadre of diplomats it was planning to keep in Iraq following last December’s withdrawal of U.S. troops, The New York Times reported.

Despite having built an embassy in Baghdad that is among the world’s largest, officials cited continuing suspicions among Iraqis toward the 2,000 Americans there, who themselves report frustration at their inability to circulate outside the embassy compound.

Embassy spokesman Michael McClellan said the State Department during the past year has been “considering ways to appropriately reduce the size of the U.S. mission in Iraq, primarily by decreasing the number of contractors needed to support the embassy’s operations.”

Since U.S. troops departed, sectarian violence and political instability have continued.

Powered by WordPress and Motion by 85ideas.