Tag Archive: services


ARCHIVES

If President Obama wants to meet his goal of dramatically increasing the number of hybrid and all-electric vehicles in the federal fleet, the General Services Administration will have to buy a lot of them this year.

In 2008, on the presidential campaign trail, Obama pledged that “half of all cars purchased by the federal government will be plug-in hybrids or all-electric by 2012.” But PolitiFact reports that so far, GSA hasn’t come close to that goal. In 2010, the most recent year for which data is available, GSA bought 63,794 cars for agency use. Of those,4,853 were gasoline hybrids and 1,376 were electric. Added together, that amounts to about 10 percent of total fleet purchases.

Of course, GSA might have dramatically ramped up its hybrid and electric purchases in 2011, and carried the trend into this year. Even so, it would take a heroic effort to meet Obama’s goal.

That’s not to suggest that GSA isn’t buying green. In 2010, purchases of cars that run on E-85 (an 85 percent ethanol blend) exceeded those for standard gasoline vehicles for the first time. Purchases of gasoline hybrids and electric cars went  up from a total of 537 (only six of which were electric) in 2008 to more than 6,000 in 2010.

Tom Shoop is vice president and editor in chief at Government Executive Media Group, where he oversees both print and online editorial operations. He started as associate editor of Government Executive magazine in 1989; launched the company’s flagship website, GovExec.com, in 1996; and was named editor in chief in 2007.

Want to contribute to this story? Share your addition in comments.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
readers comments powered by

Six former employees filed suit with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the Food and Drug Administration alleging the agency monitored their personal emails warning Congress that risky medical devices had been approved, The Washington Post has reported.

The scientists and doctors claimed the information gathered on them contributed to harassment and wrongful termination by FDA, the Post reported Sunday.

All six former employees worked in the office of device evaluation and beginning in 2007 brought concerns about FDA approval of potentially ineffective medical devices to Congress, the White House, and the Health and Human Services Department’s inspector general.

FDA monitored their correspondence and twice asked the HHS inspector general to launch an investigation, stating doctors and scientists had improperly disclosed confidential business information about the devices, according to documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request filed by the former agency workers.

“We have obtained new information confirming the existence of information disclosures that undermine the integrity and mission of the FDA and, we believe, may be prohibited by law,” Jeffrey Shuren, director of FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, wrote in a document in June 2010.

The HHS IG declined to pursue the investigation, finding no evidence of criminal conduct both times it was requested.

The six former employees denied sharing information improperly, but still did not have their contracts renewed, suffered harassment or were fired.

An FDA spokewoman told the Post the agency does not comment on litigation.

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – Arkansas Workforce Services officials say the state is on track to repay $330 million it owes to the federal government for unemployment benefits within the next three years.

Officials with the Department of Workforce Services said Tuesday the state doesn’t plan on requesting any more advances from the federal government this year and expects to make a $30 million payment toward that debt this year.

The agency’s top officials told members of the Joint Budget Committee that, barring another recession, it expected to repay the money by 2015.

The department appeared before the committee as lawmakers prepared for the fiscal session that begins Feb. 13.

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius made a first major stop on her tour to promote health care reform on the Daily Show with Jon Stewart Monday night. It was long on jargon and short on laughs as Stewart dug into the policy weeds, focusing on how health insurance exchanges will work and the balance of oversight between federal and state government.

Sebelius could have, but didn’t, glow as Stewart asked about HHS’ latest bulletin on essential health benefits, which gave states more flexibility to determine what a health insurance plan should include.

Sebelius argued that the federal government still helps frame the benefits: Congress set 10 categories of benefits that must be covered. But “the flexibility should be at the state level,” she said.

“Isn’t that Mitt Romney’s argument?” Stewart asked. Romney has said his Massachusetts health care law isn’t a model for the 2010 health reform legislation because what works for one state doesn’t necessarily work for another.

“Actually, the way the law was written in the first place is that states get to take the lead,” Sebelius said. “States can set up their own exchanges, around a set of rules, and insurance companies for the first time have to play by a set of rules.”

She said it was ironic that some states are expressing their opposition to health reform by saying they won’t play at all. “That’s the only time the federal government steps in,” Sebelius said.

Stewart asked whether the exchanges will become “a sort of back door” to greater government involvement in health care, by decoupling insurance from employment and instead tying insurance to tax credits.

“I think what we’ll have is filling in the gaps of the private market,” Sebelius answered.

Sebelius also said that she doesn’t believe the Supreme Court will strike down the individual mandate. Even if it does, she said, “I think we keep going. We find ways to encourage people to become enrolled, and become insured.”

Part one:

Part two:


Americans todayare happier with federal services than they were a year ago, but overall trust in government has declined, according to a new survey.

The public’s satisfaction with federal services increased 2.3 percent to a score of 66.9 in 2011, after a 5 percent decrease between 2009 and 2010, the American Customer Satisfaction Index found. People’s trust in Uncle Sam, however, dropped 12 percent from a score of 41 in 2010 to 36 in 2011. The index is based on a 0 to 100 point scoring scale.

Respondents in general were more pleased with experiences at specific departments than with the government overall.

“While people generally distrust federal government as a whole, they are much more positive toward the job that individual agencies are performing,” said Claes Fornell, ACSI founder and author of The Satisfied Customer: Winners and Losers in the Battle for Buyer Preference (Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).

“Paradoxically perhaps, these findings suggest that the more people come into contact with government service, the more they actually like it,” Fornell said. “The lack of trust has much more to do with politicians than it does with federal workers and the services of the federal government.”

The Michigan-based ASCI is a national economic indicator of customer evaluations of the quality of products and services available to household consumers in the United States. Data from interviews with approximately 70,000 customers annually are used to measure satisfaction with more than 225 companies in 47 industries and 10 economic sectors, along with more than 200 services, programs and the websites of approximately 130 federal government agencies.

Federal agencies that administer benefits largely received higher scores than those with a regulatory mission, the survey found. Some federal agencies, such as the National Weather Service and the State Department’s Bureau of Consular Affairs, received scores on par with the highest-rated private sector firms, including Amazon.com and FedEx, according to the report.

People were not as happy with departments such as Homeland Security and Treasury, largely due to negative impressions of and experiences with their two best-known agencies: the Transportation Security Administration and the Internal Revenue Service. DHS’ Office of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, however, scored highly in the information and news category, and taxpayers who filed their taxes electronically were more satisfied than those who submitted paperwork.

DHS and Treasury can take solace in the fact that they scored higher than the two worst private sector companies included in the survey: Pepco Holdings and Delta Air Lines.

Despite the increase in satisfaction with federal services, the government still trails the lowest scoring private sector segment in the index. One weak spot is handling complaints, the report said. The government received a score of 44 out of 100 for its performance in handling complaints, which was only slightly better the airline industry’s score of 43.

The index also found that political ideology played a role in how respondents felt about government. Respondents who identified themselves as liberal were more satisfied with and had more trust in government than those who characterized themselves as conservative.

In addition to its report on the federal government, ACSI this week released its fourth quarter 2011 report on the public’s satisfaction with e-government, which received a score of 75.1 “Citizens remain considerably more satisfied when they interact with the government online than they are with their government experiences overall,” said a press release accompanying the report. ACSI and customer experience analytics firm ForeSee produced the e-gov findings.

The Pentagon has pushed back a Jan. 15 deadline for military services and federal agencies to report on congressionally mandated strategies for downsizing computer rooms, a Defense Information Systems Agency official said.

A provision in the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act, enacted two weeks ago, had ordered Defense Department components to develop plans by that date as part of a recommended Defensewide shift to commercial cloud services. Read the whole story at Nextgov.com.

The mileage reimbursement rate for federal employees who use their private vehicles for work is not increasing in 2012, the General Services Administration announced.

The rate for cars will remain 51 cents per mile. The Internal Revenue Service changed the reimbursement level last summer due to high gas prices to 55.5 cents per mile for people who use their personal vehicles on the job. The IRS rate also will remain the same in 2012. GSA sets the government reimbursement rate and is not obligated to match the IRS’ rate.

The government reimbursement rates for other modes of transportation remain the same as well: $1.29 per mile for airplanes. 19 cents per mile for government-owned vehicles and 48 cents for motorcycles.

In December 2011, the National Treasury Employees Union called on GSA to raise the mileage reimbursement rates. “I would remind you that federal employees are suffering under a pay freeze, making substandard reimbursement for the expenses they incur performing government work all the more burdensome,” NTEU President Colleen Kelley wrote in a letter to GSA Administrator Martha Johnson.

In other transit-related news, Congress failed to act on legislation before Jan. 1 that would extend mass transit benefits to commuters. Federal employees’ current mass transit benefit of $230 a month — equal to the benefit for parking — dropped to $125 a month in 2012. The law that sets the amount of pretax earnings that private sector workers can set aside for travel to and from work also determines the commuter subsidy for federal employees.

GSA requests buyout authority

The General Services Administration on Tuesday submitted a request to the Office of Personnel Management seeking permission to offer voluntary early retirement authority and voluntary separation incentive payments to a select number of its employees, according to a GSA spokesman.

If OPM approves the request, voluntary early retirement authority and voluntary separation incentive payment offerings will be made to less than 5 percent of GSA’s workforce.

The decision comes on the heels of a comprehensive workforce analysis within the GSA, according to the spokesman who asked not to be named because the offer had not yet been approved.

“As a result of that analysis, several offices identified specific categories that had a position that did not align with their current or predicted business priorities,” the spokesman said. Those offices include Federal Acquisition Services and the offices of Citizen Service and Innovative Technology, Governmentwide Policy and the Chief Financial Officer, the spokesman said.

“It was an opportunity to strategically reshape GSA’s workforce in a way that is more consistent with our evolving mission,” he added.

GSA noted in a statement provided to Government Executive on Tuesday that VERA and VSIP are “strictly voluntary” and “will be a win-win for eligible employees thinking about retiring or leaving federal service, and help FAS meet our long-term strategic goals.”

The agency is among many that have turned to buyouts and early retirement as a way to a cope with a tough fiscal climate.

GSA could not say when OPM was expected to approve its request.

Investors are becoming more price conscious. In response to the increased pressure to lower 401(k) costs, alternatives to traditional mutual fund investments that offer significantly lower fees are growing in popularity.

The latest offering is an all-index 401(k) plan announced Tuesday by Schwab Retirement Plan Services Inc.

The investment choices for the Schwab Index Advantage plan are limited to index funds, which are designed to track established market indexes such as the S&P 500. Index investing continues to grow in popularity because index funds do not carry the higher fees of actively managed funds. The plan will use Schwab-branded funds and those of other large well-known fund providers offering a range of equity sizes, styles, and geographies as well as bonds and other asset classes.

Schwab said it also is developing a version of the 401(k) plan that will use only index-based exchange-traded funds. ETFs also track various indexes, but they are bought and sold throughout the day like stocks. This feature has some in the retirement plan industry worried about their inclusion as an option in a 401(k) plan. The concern is some investors may be enticed to trade too frequently which could hurt their performance.

Still, the cost advantages of index investing are clear.

The average actively managed large-cap mutual fund carries an annual expense ratio of around 1.3 percent, while the average large-cap index fund costs around 0.71 percent. The expense ratio is the percentage of assets an investor pays to invest in the fund. A comparable index ETF costs around 0.33 percent, Morningstar Inc. said.

Schwab isn’t alone. Other companies are moving into lower cost index funds include The Vanguard Group, the nation’s largest mutual fund company. In September it announced plans to convert its LifeStrategy stock-and-bond funds to index-only investments from a strategy of using managed and index funds.

ING Direct has offered index ETFs in its Sharebuilder 401(k) for a few years. T.D. Ameritrade also offers an ETF option for 401(k) plans.

Fidelity Investments said it continues to believe that ETFs are not the best investment vehicles for 401(k) accounts. That’s primarily because investors should be focusing on long-term investing and the daily trading of ETFs only encourages them to try to time the market, which will likely hurt their performance, a company spokesman said.

Fidelity, which currently offers one ETF that tracks the Nasdaq exchange, has filed documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission to offer more but isn’t rushing to offer an ETF-loaded 401(k).

Fees cut into the returns of a 401(k) account and can reduce the amount saved by tens of thousands of dollars by retirement for the average worker.

“We know that through index funds we can ultimately take a lot of expense — what we call drag — off of the participant’s account,” said Jim McCool, head of Institutional Services at Schwab. “That translates to more money in their account just by trimming the expense factor down.”

In addition to the savings, Schwab is providing a consultation with an adviser from GuidedChoice Asset Management Inc. to help workers choose the right funds for their retirement goals.

For those who prefer to keep at least some money in cash to balance their 401(k) portfolio, the new plan also includes the option to save money in an FDIC-insured savings account with Charles Schwab Bank.

San Francisco-based Schwab services about 1,300 401(k) plans with 1.5 million participants and a total of $90 billion in plan assets.

WASHINGTON (NEWS.GNOM.ES) – U.S. healthcare spending barely rose in 2010 from record-low recession levels, as high unemployment and the loss of private health insurance forced many Americans to delay or forego medical treatment, government officials said on Monday.

Spending edged up 3.9 percent, bringing the total size of the U.S. healthcare system to $2.6 trillion, or $8,402 per person, according to a report released by the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, and published in the journal Health Affairs. For a graphic, see: http://link.NEWS.GNOM.ES.com/but85s

Growth in 2010 was only a slim 0.1 percentage point higher than the 3.8 percent recorded in 2009, which was the lowest rate recorded in half a century. Per capita health spending in the United States is still the highest worldwide.

“It’s absolutely clear what’s going on,” said William Galston of the Brookings Institution. “People’s budgets have been hard-hit, and even if they have 20 percent co-pays from their insurance companies, that 20 percent may still be too much.”

The data are likely to play prominently in the political debate over U.S. government spending as President Barack Obama’s 2010 healthcare reform law approaches challenges from the Supreme Court and he fights for reelection in November.

The healthcare industry’s share of the U.S. economy was unchanged for the first time since 2006 at 17.9 percent as output from other sectors recovered from the downturn that ended in June 2009.

But even as recession-ravaged consumers avoided prescription drugs, hospitals, doctors and clinics in 2010, medical prices remained on an upward trajectory that slowed only marginally during the 2007-2009 recession.

It was not clear how consumers might have fared in 2011 as the recovery gathered pace and unemployment declined. But some analysts said the durability of healthcare prices and pent-up demand for services could suggest a sharp increase in costs down the road.

Federal spending for Medicare and Medicaid, which benefit the elderly and the poor, respectively, is also a key issue in partisan political wrangling in Congress over the mounting federal debt and deficit that is widely expected to gather momentum after the 2012 elections.

WHITE HOUSE CITES PREMIUM JUMP

The White House welcomed the report as evidence healthcare could be tamed but said it demonstrated the need for consumer protections set out in the Affordable Care Act health reform law, including a requirement that insurance companies justify large premium increases.

“In 2010, the net cost of health insurance – which includes the overhead and insurance company profits – increased by 8.4 percent. That’s more than twice the increase in the cost of health care,” deputy White House Chief of Staff Nancy-Ann DeParle said in an official blog posting.

Analysts also noted that insurance premiums grew faster than benefits for the first time in seven years.

The healthcare reform law, Obama’s signature domestic policy achievement, accounted for only 0.1 percent of the rise in spending in 2010. But much of the law is not scheduled to take effect until 2014, when it is expected to extend coverage to more than 30 million uninsured Americans by expanding Medicaid and setting up state-run health insurance exchanges.

The federal government’s $743 billion healthcare bill climbed to 29 percent of total spending, while other spending sources from businesses and households to state and local governments saw their shares of spending decline.

“The greater federal burden contributes more to the deficit, and so in early 2013 there will be even more pressure to cut back, specifically on Medicare, and the promises made to the uninsured through the Affordable Care Act,” said Joseph Antos of the conservative American Enterprise Institute.

Federal spending in dollar terms rose mainly as a result of the Obama administration’s efforts to help cash-strapped state governments by paying a greater share of Medicaid, which saw enrollment rise as 3.7 million people lost their private health insurance. The Medicaid assistance ended last July.

But the rate of spending growth slowed for both Medicaid and Medicare as Medicaid enrollment decelerated from recession levels and fewer senior citizens signed up for Medicare Advantage, which allows the elderly to purchase private insurance through Medicare.

Medicaid, which is jointly funded by federal and state governments, spent $401 billion, an increase of 7.2 percent. Medicare program costs grew 5 percent to $525 billion.

Prescription drugs, which accounted for 10 percent of healthcare spending, saw historically low growth due largely to the use of generic drugs, a drop in new product introductions and an increase in Medicaid prescription drug rebates.

Hospital services registered a fourth consecutive year of slower growth as consumers postponed medical care even at emergency rooms. Doctors and clinics also saw historically low spending growth, despite stable price increases, due to fewer visits and a less-severe flu season.

(Additional reporting by Anna Yukhananov)

Powered by WordPress and Motion by 85ideas.