Tag Archive: president


Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack may have been slightly upstaged by the mock-competitive banter of MSNBC Morning Joe stars Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough as they led nearly 1,000 Agriculture Department employees in a ceremony on Tuesday marking the 150th anniversary of USDA’s creation.

The TV stars performed gratis following Vilsack’s appearance on their show earlier in the day, emceeing remarks by top officials representing each of the department’s disparate missions and joining with former Washington Redskins football stars Art Monk and LaVar Arrington to lead the crowd doing jumping jacks.

“This country has many shortcomings, but it has freed more people and fed more people than any other country in the world,” Scarborough said, praising the department for having “done so much for economic growth.”

Brzezinski said, “It’s not often that we get to celebrate an institution that has been around since long before television and other technology.”

Vilsack, speaking in front of a huge portrait of President Lincoln to the packed-to-capacity headquarters cafeteria, remarked on the 16th president’s signing of three key pieces of legislation from May to July of 1862 — the Department of Agriculture Act, the Homestead Act and the Morrill Act, which created land-grant universities.

“Lincoln encouraged research,” Vilsack said, which is why today’s department maintains such a “close relationship with universities to create new seed and food safety technologies while also working with the private sector.” He noted how farm production of key crops has grown exponentially during his lifetime and how exports have expanded, particularly during the past three to five years. The newly signed treaties with South Korea and Colombia, he added, will help knock down trade barriers.

The average age of farmers today, the secretary said, mirrors his own, 61, so Congress should review the estate tax with an eye toward removing barriers to transferring farm property to the younger generation.

Opening the ceremony with prayers from a Native American tribal leader and a Catholic nun, the hosts introduced officials from Agriculture’s divisions devoted to nutrition, the Forest Service and conservation. The audience included 4H Club members and jacketed Future Farmers of America as well as Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb.; Rep. Tim Holden, D-Pa.; and Del. Gregorio Sablan, a Democrat representing the Northern Mariana Islands. Also on hand were a costumed Smokey Bear and Woodsy Owl (famous for delivering the “Give a Hoot, Don’t Pollute” slogan).

Audrey Rowe, administrator for the Food and Nutrition Service, reviewed the department’s programs to feed children and the elderly, praising the 2010 Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act for “trying to surround school children with healthy food” by upgrading lunch menus and vending machine offerings.

NFL stars Monk and Arrington described their endorsement of the Fuel Up to Play 60 Program, a joint effort by USDA and the nation’s dairy farmers to combat childhood obesity and promote 60 minutes of exercise daily. Monk confessed to a fondness for yogurt, which his wife considers “lady food.”

Stephen Gage, an emergency management specialist at the Forest Service, described his staff’s sudden assignment, on the day of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, to travel to the Pentagon and put out fires. “We did what millions of Americans wanted to do on 9/11, which was come help,” he said.

Maggie Rhodes, a USDA employee who volunteered for an assignment in Afghanistan, described her work on a reconstruction team providing technical farming assistance and aid to Afghani women seeking an education.

Jessica Shahin, associate administrator for the Supplemental Nutrition and Assistance Program, recounted her group’s work on the Gulf Coast just after Hurricane Katrina in 2005. The emergency required SNAP to create its first eligibility policy for evacuees, and her team supplied 1.4 million households with more than $688 million in food, she said.

Dave White, chief of the department’s Natural Resources Conservation Service, described his team’s work in the Gulf Coast following the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Seeing that the human-made disaster coincided with a drought in the Southeast, he worked with scientists and farmers to create, in just three months, 500,000 acres of “instant wetlands” to host migratory birds whose patterns had been disrupted. “We turned what potentially was an environmental catastrophe into an environmental success,” White said.

Also speaking on conservation was musician Chuck Leavell, who, when not playing keyboards for the Rolling Stones and the Allman Brothers, is a tree farmer in Georgia. “USDA has made a tremendous difference in the stewardship of land,” he said before sitting down at a piano to perform the Beatles’ “Here Comes the Sun” and Blind Willie McTell’s “Statesboro Blues.”

Cecilia Munoz, director of the Domestic Policy Council and assistant to the president, praised the department as a job creator, noting the farm industry’s $137 billion in exports in 2011 before introducing a 30-second video thank-you from President Obama. On Monday, Obama signed a proclamation, which said, “The USDA has stood shoulder to shoulder with the American people for generations.”

The celebration will continue Wednesday, according to a USDA spokesman, when Vilsack travels to Penn State to mark the law creating land-grant universities and Deputy Secretary Kathleen Merrigan does the same at the University of California at Davis.

Acting Budget Director Jeffrey Zients on Friday instructed all agency heads to step up efforts to economize through more selective employee travel and conference planning, as well as through improved management of vehicle fleets and disposal of unneeded federal properties.

In a memo, Zients directed agencies to build on cost-containment strategies in the works since President Obama’s Nov. 9, 2011, executive order on efficient spending. Zients noted the president’s 2013 budget identifies $8 billion in reduced costs as a result of that order.

“From his first days in office, President Obama has led a concerted and aggressive effort to streamline government and cut wasteful and inefficient spending wherever it exists so that we can focus our resources on serving the American people,” Zients wrote in an accompanying blog post. “From slowing the uncontrolled growth of federal contracting to getting rid of excess real estate held by agencies and reining in spending on federal employee travel, this administration has already cut billions in inefficient spending across the federal government.”

He added, “these efforts and others have already produced more than $280 million in reduced costs in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the same period in fiscal 2010.” In the area of travel, every agency is to spend at least 30 percent less in fiscal 2013 and maintain that level through 2016.

On conferences, the memo requires deputy secretaries to review any such event if it could cost an agency more than $100,000. It requires department secretaries to personally sign a waiver for conferences costing more than $500,000. It also requires agencies to post publicly each January on the prior year’s conference spending, including descriptions of agency conferences that cost more than $100,000.

On fleets, agencies will use existing General Services Administration fleet services, or initiate a replacement and renewal schedule that is consistent with requirements spelled out in a May 2011 presidential memorandum and the Federal Management Regulation.

On property ownership, agencies are barred, as of Friday, from increasing the size of their civilian real estate inventory, except under specified conditions.

Both chambers of Congress are starting their engines for transit parity for commuters. Tax benefits for commuting via public transportation and those for driving used to be equal, but parity was derailed when Congress failed to extend mass transit perks by a Dec. 31, 2011, deadline. Benefits used to be $230 a month for both public transportation and driving, but now a maximum of $125 is available to mass transit commuters.

In February, we wrote that labor union leaders were revved up about a bill (S. 1034) introduced by Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., that would reinstate transit parity.

After parking that proposal in the Senate Finance Committee, the measure was included in the Senate’s massive transportation bill in March.

Now, the National Treasury Employees Union is hoping the issue will gain even more traction with a similar House proposal (H.R. 2412).

National Treasury Employees Union President Colleen Kelley and Rep. James McGovern, D-Mass., testified before a House panel last week on the provision, a companion to the Senate proposal.

“It’s good for employers, good for employees, good for the environment and helps take cars off our congested roads,” McGovern told the panel.

It’s unclear how quickly the bipartisan proposal will accelerate through Congress to become law, but McGovern testified that he is “hopeful that we can restore parity — which has bipartisan support — in the coming weeks.”

IT Pay Stagnant, At Best

The total compensation package for federal information technology employees has stayed flat or actually decreased thanks to the two-year salary freeze for federal workers, according to a new survey by InformationWeek.

The survey of 480 federal IT staffers and 253 federal IT managers found that average total compensation for federal IT staff is flat, at $97,000, while federal IT management actually saw a drop of 4 percent in average total compensation. Their pay and benefits packages fell to $120,000 from $125,000 in 2011.

Despite those grim figures, however, federal IT staff and management still make more than their private sector counterparts, the survey found. Total compensation for private sector IT staffers is $90,000, and it is $116,000 for private sector IT managers, according to the survey. “That’s also higher than state and local governments, which are among the least-lucrative sectors for IT pros,” the survey stated.

It’s important to note that the two-year pay freeze President Obama instituted in 2010 did not affect pay increases related to promotions, step increases or bonuses. Even so, neither IT staff nor IT managers saw increases in base salary or total compensation in 2011, the survey found.

In addition to the two-year pay freeze, the Office of Personnel Management last year placed a cap on performance-based bonuses at 5 percent of base salary for senior employees and 1 percent for others, and asked agencies to award step increases only to employees who meet certain performance standards. Fifty-six percent of federal IT staff and 69 percent of IT managers said they expected to receive a bonus in 2012, however, up 8 percent and 12 percent, respectively, since last year. About three-quarters of respondents said they expect these bonuses to be awarded based on good performance, the survey found.

Still, despite flat salaries, overall satisfaction with pay among federal IT staff and managers remains high. Seventy percent of federal IT staff and 71 percent of IT managers are satisfied or very satisfied with compensation this year compared to 71 percent and 82 percent, respectively, last year, the survey found.

Overall, job satisfaction among federal IT staff and managers also has remained high, though the number of respondents who said they are very satisfied dropped a few percentage points since last year. Federal IT workers said they care most about base pay, job stability, a flexible schedule, benefits and challenging work.

ARCHIVES

American Federation of Government Employees President John Gage is not happy that Mitt Romney chose the moment of his de facto victory in the race for the Republican presidential nomination to lament the “unfairness of government workers getting better pay and benefits than the taxpayers they serve.”

In a letter to Romney, Gage laid into the presumptive nominee, accusing him of “spreading false claims as facts and tarnishing the image of government workers to score political points.”

Some excerpts from the letter:

AFGE members are outraged by your recent comments disparaging government workers. You know what’s really unfair? The specter of having a new boss who thinks so little about the work that you do that he can’t bother getting his facts straight before making the ridiculous and patently false claim that federal workers are “getting better pay and benefits than the taxpayers they serve.”

 

As the head of the largest federal employee union, representing more than 650,000 federal workers who live in rural towns and cities all across America, let me set a few things straight for you. More than half of these decent, hardworking, middle-class Americans earn less than $70,000 a year, and one-fourth earn less than $50,000. Decades of research by the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics has consistently proven that federal employees earn less than their private sector counterparts.

Tell me this: Do you think the meat and poultry inspector who earns less than $32,000 a year while protecting Americans from E. Coli and other deadly diseases is making too much? How about the correctional officer who earns less than $39,000 a year while guarding ruthless gang leaders in understaffed federal penitentiaries? And do you really think that the VA nursing assistant who earns just over $27,000 a year providing care to veterans who have come home with serious psychological trauma is living the high life?

Unlike the millionaires and billionaires you seem most interested in serving, federal employees don’t have a golden parachute waiting for them when they retire. The vast majority of a federal employee’s retirement income comes from personal investments in the government’s 401(k) plan and mandatory payments into Social Security. Yes, they also receive a modest pension when they retire. But I can think of nothing more unfair than a company failing to provide their employees with even a tiny nest egg to supplement an employee’s own savings and meager Social Security income.

Tom Shoop is vice president and editor in chief at Government Executive Media Group, where he oversees both print and online editorial operations. He started as associate editor of Government Executive magazine in 1989; launched the company’s flagship website, GovExec.com, in 1996; and was named editor in chief in 2007.

Want to contribute to this story? Share your addition in comments.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

ARCHIVES

One of the things I love most about leadership coaching is the opportunity to see lots of different executives in action. I get to see them in team meetings, in presentations, in one-on-one’s, and just walking around the plant or office. In addition to the first-hand observations, I usually collect a lot of feedback from the executives’ managers, peers and direct reports. It’s a lot of good data, and I love culling through it for patterns that underlie high performance.

Here’s a conclusion I’ve come to lately. The best leaders spend less time transmitting and more time receiving.

The transmitters are so focused on driving their agenda and goals that people eventually tune them out. It’s sort of like changing the dial on the radio or fast forwarding on the DVR when the commercials come on. You’ve heard it all so much that you just want to ignore it.

The receivers have agendas and goals as well but they do more than just hammer the message home. They stop to learn and observe what’s going on with people. They stop because they think they might actually have something to learn that will help everyone reach or exceed the goal faster and better.

Are you a transmitter or a receiver? Here’s a quick self-assessment:

  • Do You Know People’s Names? There’s a funny new show on HBO called Veep in which Julia Louis Dreyfuss plays a total unlikable vice president of the United States. In the first episode, she has an aide constantly beside her to whisper the name of or personal facts about the person she’s just about to shake hands. If you find yourself wishing that you had a secret weapon like that, you’re probably a transmitter. Receivers take the time to learn people’s names and what’s going on in their lives.
  • Do You Ask People What They Think? One of my favorite stories of all time was the Inc. magazine profile on their 2006 Entrepreneur of the Year, the late Ken Hendricks. In around 40 years, he went from being a roofing assistant to owning a multibillion dollar roofing supply company. He did it by buying one company after another and improving them. When asked what his most important strategy was, he said he went to the loading dock of the company he had just bought and asked the folks on the dock what they would do if they were in charge. He then implemented all of their ideas. He said he had about a 90% hit rate on good ideas and that was good enough to use the strategy again and again. Receivers ask some version of the question, “What would you do if you were in charge?”
  • Do You Shut Up Enough To Listen? I love that line about we were given two ears and one mouth for a reason. That’s actually a pretty good ratio. Receivers tend to listen twice as much as they talk.

So what is it for you – transmission or reception? What other tips do you have for leaders who want to be receivers more than transmitters?

(Image via Zacarias Pereira da Mata /Shutterstock.com)

Executive coach Scott Eblin’s goal is to help you succeed at the next level of leadership. Throughout the week, he’ll offer his take on the leadership lessons in the news and his advice on your most pressing leadership questions. A former government executive, Scott is a graduate of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government and is the author of The Next Level: What Insiders Know About Executive Success.

Want to contribute to this story? Share your addition in comments.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

The House on Wednesday by voice vote approved the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act to increase transparency on agency spending, with speakers on the floor repeatedly invoking the recent spending scandal at the General Services Administration.

The DATA Act (H.R. 2146) would impose a universal reporting requirement for recipients of federal grants, loans and contracts, while requiring all agencies to use the same formats to publicly share their internal and external obligations and expenditures. A late amendment would also curb agency spending on conferences.

Support for the House legislation was bipartisan, with Republicans and Democrats both blasting the recently revealed $820,000 Las Vegas conference held by GSA’s Western Regions in October 2010. Support in the Senate appears more limited.

The GSA conference funding was “cobbled together from different baskets of money, so GSA officials could have family vacations,” said DATA Act chief sponsor, Darrell Issa, R-Calif., chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Neither the staff of his committee nor the inspectors general alone can protect the American taxpayer against wasteful spending, he added, which is why the bill’s approach of “recipient reporting” is needed.

Issa thanked various open-government groups for their help in shaping the bill, as well as Vice President Joe Biden and retired Recovery Board Chairman Earl Devaney, whose Recovery.gov website served as a model for the DATA Act’s approach to tracking spending.

The committee’s ranking minority member Elijah Cummings, D-Md., also commended the bipartisan effort, noting that some of the bill’s provisions echo President Obama’s executive orders to curb waste and reduce agency spending on travel. Cummings also praised colleagues for accepting changes in the bill, which originally was introduced in June 2011.

One of the two dozen transparency advocacy groups that backed the bill, the nonprofit OMB Watch, said in an analysis that it switched its stance from opposition to support for the bill once provisions were removed that would have repealed an earlier transparency law, the 2006 Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act, and another that would have required a more restrictive “sunset” of the DATA Act.

After the legislation was approved under suspension of the rules, OMB Watch President Katherine McFate said the vote “represents a bipartisan congressional commitment to new levels of government openness. In the coming years, our nation will be facing tough choices about how we spend precious public dollars. The DATA Act is a critical first step toward ensuring that every citizen has the information he or she needs to understand the choices our public officials make while investing public resources.”

One of the DATA Act’s key champions, Rep. Dennis Ross, R-Fla., warned on the House floor that the bill “sends a clear message to bureaucrats in Washington, D.C., that the American public is watching and demands accountability.” Ross on Tuesday introduced a bill (HR 4472) to reduce travel budgets of every agency by half next fiscal year, and more in subsequent years, while requiring more-detailed reports of agency travel spending to congressional committees.

Certain Defense Department employees will have their premium pay cap waived through 2012, according to an agency memo.

Eligible civilian Defense employees can receive basic and premium pay up to $230,700 for the year. The current premium pay cap, which the government also waived in 2011, is $179,900. Employees working overseas in support of military or emergency operations in areas covered by U.S. Central Command as well as those formerly of CENTCOM now under U.S. Africa Command are eligible for the waiver.

The amount of basic pay and premium pay cannot exceed $230,700, which is the vice president’s salary in 2012.

Premium pay typically includes additional compensation for overtime, night, Sunday or holiday work. The 2009 National Defense Authorization Act first authorized the waiver of the cap and Congress has continued to extend it.

One difference from previous years is civilian employees assigned to Iraq are no longer considered to be supporting a military operation, as forces withdrew in December 2011. “Instead, beginning in 2012, such employees are deemed to meet the eligibility standards for the increased premium pay cap based on their performance of work in direct support of or directly related to the response to a national emergency declared by the president; Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the Stabilization of Iraq, signed May 17, 2011,” the memo said.

Any additional pay employees receive as a result of the higher cap cannot be used to calculate retirement benefits or for lump-sum payments for accumulated and accrued annual leave.

Stuart J. Ishimaru, a member of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, will resign at the end of April, according to a statement from the EEOC.

Ishimaru was nominated to the commission by President George W. Bush in 2003 and is currently serving a second term, which expires July 1. He also served as EEOC acting chairman from January 2009 until April 7, 2010.

During that time, he is credited with working to rebuild the commission, “which had become underfunded and understaffed,” the commission said in a statement.

“He dedicated substantial agency resources to a multi-million dollar training effort — the largest the agency had conducted in at least a decade — to equip EEOC employees with essential skills and knowledge they need to investigate and litigate large and complex discrimination (systemic) cases to bring about positive change in entire companies and industries,” EEOC added.

Ishimaru is credited with being the first administration official to testify before Congress in support of the Employment Nondiscrimination Act, which would prohibit employment based on sexual orientation and gender identity. He also spearheaded a public commission focusing on age discrimination.

“His accomplishments as a member of the commission and acting chairman have been exceptional,” EEOC Chair Jacqueline Berrien said in a statement. “He has been a tremendous colleague, and we will miss his fervent commitment to civil rights law enforcement and myriad contributions to the work of the commission.”

At a time when friends of federal workers are hard to come by, a former senator has stepped up.

Ted Kaufman, a Democrat who represented Delaware in the Senate from 2009 to 2010 after Joe Biden left to become vice president, penned an op-ed in the Wilmington News Journal on Saturday defending government employees, arguing that business strategies for recruiting the best executive talent — including providing attractive salaries and benefits — also should apply to the public sector. The piece was republished in The Huffington Post on Tuesday.

Additionally, Kaufman said, current lawmakers obscure the big picture by focusing on the high price of federal pensions.

“We need to take a hard look at pensions, but it is important in a fair society that reforms take into account the fact that over the years many public employees helped meet government budgets by forgoing salary increases in return for ironclad promises about pension benefits,” he wrote.

As the constant trimming of the federal workforce continues, Kaufman warned, “We are losing the very people we need to make us successful.”

During his short time in the Senate, Kaufman became one of Congress’ most vocal proponents of government workers. He organized a Great Federal Employees exhibition at the Russell Senate Office Building Rotunda in February 2010 and frequently praised federal employees on the Senate floor.

ARCHIVES

This weekend’s centennial of the sinking of the Titanic has revived memories of a much-beloved high-level federal official who went down with the ship.

Army Maj. Archibald Butt was an intimate of presidents Teddy Roosevelt and William Howard Taft, serving as top White House aide, bodyguard, and transport administrator after moving from a newspaper career to become a successful Army quartermaster officer in the Philippines.

Exhausted from many White House banquets, Butt was vacationing in Rome in April 1912 when he and prominent painter Frank Millet booked passage on the “unsinkable” ship from Southampton, England.

After the iceberg collision and the abandon-ship order, Butt was seen with three other men sitting calmly in a smoking room. They “seemed deliberately trying to avoid the noisy confusion of the Boat Deck,” wrote historian Walter Lord. But as numerous survivor accounts would testify, Butt was soon helping women and children including steerage passengers into lifeboats. Butt’s story “had a dozen different endings—all gallant, none verified,” Lord said.

President Taft later wrote in tribute that Butt “would certainly remain on the ship’s deck until every duty had been performed and every sacrifice made….” He approved a design for the Butt-Millet Memorial Fountain, still on the Ellipse, funds for which were raised privately via marquee names–Tiffany, Olmstead, Frick. A bas-relief honoring Butt is at Washington National Cathedral. And in Arlington Cemetery, on a hill near the Tomb of Unknown Soldier, he is honored with a relatively large Celtic cross, on a spot that Butt himself had selected.

Arlington attorney George Dodge, who became interested in Butt while researching a book on Arlington Cemetery, admires him as “an example of a public servant willing to sacrifice everything for his superiors.”

Charlie Clark joined Government Executive in the fall of 2009. He has been on staff at The Washington Post, Congressional Quarterly, National Journal, Time-Life Books, Tax Analysts, the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, and the National Center on Education and the Economy. He has written or edited online news, daily news stories, long features, wire copy, magazines, books and organizational media strategies.

Want to contribute to this story? Share your addition in comments.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Powered by WordPress and Motion by 85ideas.