Tag Archive: international



AURORA, ON, May 10, 2012 /NEWS.GNOM.ES/ - Magna International Inc. (TSX: MG, NYSE: MGA) announced voting results from its 2012 annual meeting of shareholders
held today. A total of 192,293,612 million Common Shares, or 82% of our
issued and outstanding Common Shares, were voted in connection with the
annual meeting. Shareholders voted in favour of all items of business,
including election of each director nominee by a substantial majority
as follows:

Scott Bonham 99.33%
Peter G. Bowie 99.33%
Hon. J. Trevor Eyton 98.40%
V. Peter Harder 97.36%
Lady Barbara Judge 89.35%
Kurt J. Lauk 99.73%
Frank Stronach 79.94%
Donald J. Walker 98.67%
Lawrence D. Worrall 99.22%
William Young 99.65%

Additionally, Magna’s advisory “say on pay” vote received 80% support. 
Full results of the votes are included as Appendix A to this press
release.

Immediately following the meeting, the independent directors elected at
the meeting selected William (Bill) Young as the new Board Chair and
approved the following committee appointments:

  • Audit Committee: Lawrence Worrall (Chair), Peter Bowie and Dr. Kurt Lauk.
  • Corporate Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee: Bill Young (Chair), Trevor Eyton and Peter Harder. This Committee
    combines the respective oversight functions previously carried out
    separately by our Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee and
    our Nominating Committee.
  • Enterprise Risk Management Committee: Lady Barbara Judge (Chair), Scott Bonham and Lawrence Worrall. This
    Committee will be responsible for oversight of our environmental,
    health and safety activities which were previously carried out by our
    Health and Safety and Environmental Committee, as well as our overall
    enterprise risk management activities.

In accordance with our Board Charter, each Committee of Magna’s Board is
composed solely of independent directors.  Committee Charters will be
updated in due course to reflect the above changes to the Committee
structure.

About Magna

We are the most diversified global automotive supplier.  We design,
develop and manufacture technologically advanced automotive systems,
assemblies, modules and components, and engineer and assemble complete
vehicles, primarily for sale to original equipment manufacturers of
cars and light trucks.  Our capabilities include the design,
engineering, testing and manufacture of automotive interior systems;
seating systems; closure systems; body and chassis systems; vision
systems; electronic systems; exterior systems; powertrain systems; roof
systems; hybrid and electric vehicles/systems; as well as complete
vehicle engineering and assembly.

We have over 111,000 employees in 294 manufacturing operations and 87
product development, engineering and sales centres in 26 countries.

APPENDIX A

VOTING RESULTS – 2012 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Resolution Vote Type* Voted Voted (%)
Elect Scott Bonham as Director For
Withheld
186,805,447
1,254,907
99.33
0.67
Elect Peter G. Bowie as Director For
Withheld
186,808,661
1,251,694
99.33
0.67
Elect Hon. J. Trevor Eyton as Director For
Withheld
185,053,868
3,006,486
98.40
1.60
Elect V. Peter Harder as Director For
Withheld
183,095,586
4,964,768
97.36
2.64
Elect Lady Barbara Thomas Judge as Director For
Withheld
168,039,419
20,020,935
89.35
10.65
Elect Kurt J. Lauk as Director For
Withheld
187,548,509
511,845
99.73
0.27
Elect Frank Stronach as Director For
Withheld
150,327,030
37,733,324
79.94
20.06
Elect Donald J. Walker as Director For
Withheld
185,555,237
2,505,117
98.67
1.33
Elect Lawrence D. Worrall as Director For
Withheld
186,592,975
1,467,380
99.22
0.78
Elect William Young as Director For
Withheld
187,395,596
664,758
99.65
0.35
Appointment of Auditors For
Withheld
187,757,492
4,536,120
97.64
2.36
Advisory Resolution on Approach to Executive Compensation For
Against
150,937,745
37,122,606
80.26
19.74

* No invalid proxies were submitted.

SOURCE Magna International Inc.

More than half of Thrift Savings Plan funds finished April in the red after posting mostly positive returns in 2012.

The I Fund, invested in international stocks, lost the most in April, dropping 1.87 percent. The fund, often troubled in 2011, experienced a small uptick in March and posted positive returns in both February and January of this year. The I Fund has posted losses of more than 12 percent in the past 12 months.

TSP’s S Fund, which is invested in small and midsize companies and tracks the Dow Jones Wilshire 4500 Index, posted a loss of 0.71 percent in April. The fund was down 1.24 percent in the past 12 months but up 13.64 percent so far in 2012.

The C Fund, invested in stocks on Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, lost 0.62 percent in April after climbing 3.3 percent in March and 4.34 percent in February. Both the F Fund, which is invested in fixed-income bonds, and the G fund, comprised of government-backed securities, ended April in the black, up 1.12 percent and 0.15 percent, respectively.

All the TSP’s life-cycle funds ended April in the red, except for the L Income Fund, which is for federal employees who have reached their target retirement date and already have started withdrawing money. Even that fund was nearly flat in April, with 0.01 percent growth, after rising 0.54 percent in March and 2.73 percent this year.

The L2020 lost 0.38 in April; it has increased 6.52 percent since the start of 2012. The L 2030 lost 0.52 in March but has gained more than 8 percent so far this year. The L2040 lost 0.63 percent in April but has gained more than 9 percent in 2012 overall. The L2050 has posted a 0.78 loss for the month; it has gained more than 10 percent so far but has posted a loss of 0.73 in the last 12 months. The life-cycle funds are designed to move TSP enrollees into less risky portfolios as they near retirement.

ASTANA, Kazakhstan, 30 April 2012 -/PR Newswire / – The 5th Astana Economic Forum devoted to the challenges and perspectives of economic development in a time of global transformation, will be held from May 22-24, 2012, in Kazakhstan’s capital of Astana.

Forum participants will include the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Nursultan Nazarbayev; the former President of the Federal Republic of Germany, Horst Köhler; the Prime Minister of Qatar, Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber al-Thani; the Prime Minister of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan; the Prime Minister of Georgia, Gilayri Nicoloz Zyrabovich; 25 active and former ministers, 40 leaders of international organizations, corporations and businesses, 11 Nobel Prize winners and other eminent thinkers.

One of the highlights of the Forum will be “Dialogue of Leaders: The New Financial and Economic Policy.” It will consist of a discussion of global development issues by some of the world’s most prominent figures in economics, business, politics and the mass media.

Two other important events will be a meeting of finance ministers of countries of the Commonwealth of Independent State and a conference dealing with the dysfunction in the international financial system. A key aim of the conference is to generate ideas for promoting global economic and financial stability, including ways of preventing regional recessions.

Other issues that the Forum will address include economic integration, socio-economic policy, tourism, protection of intellectual property, global energy and environmental strategies, attracting investment, and fostering innovation.

More than 5,000 people from over 80 countries are expected at the Forum, which will consist of 35 events in various formats.

The Forum will wrap up with a list of recommendations to the G-20 countries for improving and further developing the world economy. A letter with the recommendations will be sent to the G-8 and G-20 countries, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, the United Nations and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Anyone who wants to take part in the recommendation process may do so by submitting ideas at the Web site www.g-global.aef.kz.

The Astana Economic Forum established the G-Global site in response to President Nazarbayev’s call for an increase in the number of countries and individuals who help shape global economic policy.

The 5th Astana Economic Forum program, list of scheduled speakers and information on registering are available on the Forum Web site, www.aef.kz.

Major Forum organizers include the Association “Eurasian Economic Club of Scientists”, the Republic of Kazakhstan’s 14 ministries, the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Samruk-Kazyna sovereign wealth fund, the United Nations, the World Intellectual Property Organization, the Reinventing Bretton Woods Committee, the Madrid Club, the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences and many others. The media agency Success K is the major provider of the Forum’s media support.

For information about the Forum, please contact:

Eurasian Economic Club of Scientists Association
Address: 65 Temirkazyk Str.,
010001, Astana,
Republic of Kazakhstan
ph.: +7 7172 70 18 12
fax: +7 7172 70 17 96
e-mail: media@aef.kz

For Registration and Accreditation information please contact:

Media Agency Success K
Address: 010000, 2/2 Kabanbay Batyr Avenue
Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan
ph.: +7 7172 48 20 26
fax: +7 7172 24 14 30
e-mail: aef2012@media-agency.kz

Contact information

Association “Eurasian Economic Club of Scientists”: Tel. +7-7172-70-17-64

Media Agency Success K:
Tel. +7-7172-48-20-26

Translations

The Senate on Tuesday voted to curb agency spending on conferences and to limit the number of employees from a single agency who can attend.

An amendment by Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., was approved by voice vote and attached to a larger Postal Service reform bill. A similar provision has been added to the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act, which the House is scheduled to vote on Wednesday.

Coburn called the amendment a “first step in comprehensive conference and transparency reform.” It would cap the amount that could be spent on any conference at $500,000 (except when an agency is the primary sponsor) and require all conference expenses to be posted online. Agencies could shell out no more than 80 percent of what they spent on conferences in 2010, according to a Coburn statement. No more than 50 employees from a single agency would be allowed to attend international meetings.

The crackdown also would allow nonfederal foundations and other parties to finance a conference as long as they are publicly listed and vetted for conflicts of interest. Outside sponsors would be limited to one conference per year. Details on conferences would have to be posted quarterly and include a rationale for the event linked to the agency’s mission.

“Congress has finally said ‘the party’s over’ when it comes to conference spending,” Coburn said. “We have seen scandal after scandal because Congress has failed to do oversight. The purpose of oversight is to prevent scandals, not respond to scandals.”

Coburn said his reforms could save $65 million a year.

Ken Blanchard is the co-founder and chief spiritual officer of The Ken Blanchard Companies, an international management training and consulting firm. One of the most influential leadership gurus in the world, he is the author or co-author of dozens of books, including the international bestseller “The One Minute Manager.” Mark Miller is vice president of training and development for Chick-fil-A. I recently interviewed them about their new book, “Great Leaders Grow: Becoming a Leader for Life.”

In your book, you state that great leaders grow by Gaining Knowledge, Reaching Out to Others, Opening their World and Walking toward Wisdom. In your experience, which of these steps comes naturally for most leaders and which are typically more challenging?

It all depends on the leader. For some leaders, it’s natural to Gain Knowledge, because they love to read and study. Extroverted leaders find that Reaching Out to Others is an easy thing to do. For adventuresome leaders, Opening their World is built into their DNA. Those with a reflective bent find that Walking toward Wisdom comes easily. The point is that all of these practices are vital — not just one or two of them. A great leader stretches outside his or her comfort zone to develop in areas that don’t come naturally.

What’s your best advice for a leader who’s having a hard time getting started with one of the more challenging aspects of the GROW model?

We all have a tendency to limit ourselves by our own assumed constraints. To break through these self-limiting beliefs, try a few of the suggestions in the book that you find challenging. For example, if you believe that you’re a lousy teacher, find an opportunity to give some instruction, either formally in a class or by informally sharing your knowledge with others. This is part of Reaching Out to Others. Perhaps you recognize that you’re strong on giving advice but not so great at taking it. If that’s the case, find someone you admire and respect and ask that person to give you feedback about your leadership. This is part of Walking toward Wisdom. The important thing is to take action — not just to think about it.

Who are some public leaders that you admire who you think demonstrate the GROW approach in action? What do you think the rest of us can learn from them?

When it comes to demonstrating the GROW approach, two people come to mind: Garry Ridge, President/CEO of WD-40 Company, and Colleen Barrett, President Emeritus of Southwest Airlines. Fortunately, I’ve had the chance to write books with both of them.

I got to know Garry after he enrolled in our Master of Science in Executive Leadership program at University of San Diego. I shared with Garry that back when I was a college professor, I was always in trouble because I gave the final exam out the first day of class. When the faculty questioned me about that, I told them that not only would I share the final exam at the beginning of the semester, but I would also teach them the answers, so that when my students got to the final exam, they’d get As. Life is all about getting As, not some normal distribution curve! Garry was fascinated by my story and said, “Why don’t we do that in industry?” He took off on a journey to change the culture at WD-40 Company and to implement a business philosophy called “Don’t Mark My Paper, Help Me Get an A.” In 2010 WD-40 Company had the greatest financial year in the history of the company. At the same time, they handed out an internal employee satisfaction survey, which 98 percent of their people filled out — and they’re in over 60 nations! The results were overwhelmingly positive. One survey statement said: “At WD-40 Company, I am treated with respect and dignity.” Over 98.7 percent said “true” to that statement.

Colleen Barrett took over the presidency of Southwest Airlines from co-founder Herb Kelleher. Her main experience before taking that job was being Herb’s executive secretary for over 20 years. Herb understood the two aspects of leadership. He felt the vision and direction of Southwest Airlines was clear and he didn’t want a Jack Welch lookalike to come in and turn the company in a different direction. He wanted somebody who knew the implementation or servant aspect of leadership; someone who could cheerlead and keep everybody going in the direction they had set. Colleen was the perfect choice. I got so excited about her leadership that I wrote a book with her called “Lead with LUV: A Different Way to Create Real Success.”

For a leader who’s all about results, what advice do you have about how to reach out to others without coming off as a phony?

Leaders who are “all about results” are missing a big part of the success equation: relationships. If you’re not known for your relationship skills, start practicing them with the people most familiar to you and move out to others gradually. The first few times you reach out may feel uncomfortable — for both you and the other person — especially if you are not known for that type of behavior. Start casually, perhaps by stopping to chat with a person in the hallway or after a meeting. To avoid coming off as phony, be honest and real. For example, tell a co-worker about an article you read that you think he or she might genuinely be interested in. Or ask that person a question and — most importantly — listen to the answer with an intention to really understand that person’s point of view. Don’t expect instant results; relationships take time to build.

How do you define wisdom? What can leaders who find themselves running as fast as they can do to bring about more wisdom in their lives and the way they lead?

In the book, wisdom is defined as the application of knowledge, discernment, insight, experience, and judgment to make good decisions when the answer may not be obvious. To bring more wisdom into your life, start by examining yourself. What are your strengths and weaknesses? How are you adding value to your life, your organization, the world? Self-evaluation isn’t easy but it is a necessary starting point for pursuing wisdom. Next, ask your colleagues at every level for honest feedback on how you have been doing. Encourage them to be frank. Ask them what you should start doing, what you should keep doing, and what you should stop doing. Another step in the walk toward wisdom is to seek counsel from someone who has more experience or expertise in any area in which you would like to grow. Wisdom will enhance your leadership, but don’t expect to become wise overnight. Walking toward wisdom is a lifelong journey. Every step you take will enhance your growth and bring you closer to your final destiny.

ARCHIVES

With hundreds of employees and alumni in the audience, the Voice of America marked its 70th anniversary on Wednesday receiving video greetings from some very important personages.

President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Myannmar’s Nobel Peace-Prize winning opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi and the Dalai Lama all weighed in on the importance of the U.S.-based international broadcasts in defeating overseas censorship and promoting political freedom.

Obama and Clinton each offered tribute to VOA reporter Mukarram Khan Aatif, who was shot and killed by Taliban militants in January in Pakistan’s ungoverned tribal region.

Guests present in person at VOA’s Southwest Washington building included 95-year old Walter Roberts, the last surviving member of the small team that organized the first U.S. broadcasts to Nazi Germany during World War II.

Charlie Clark joined Government Executive in the fall of 2009. He has been on staff at The Washington Post, Congressional Quarterly, National Journal, Time-Life Books, Tax Analysts, the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, and the National Center on Education and the Economy. He has written or edited online news, daily news stories, long features, wire copy, magazines, books and organizational media strategies.

Want to contribute to this story? Share your addition in comments.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
readers comments powered by

WHAT:        

In celebration of International Women’s Day, international humanitarian organization Oxfam America joins Lovin’ Spoonfuls, Massachusetts Climate Action Network, Science Club for Girls, Slow Food Boston, and United Nations Association of Greater Boston for a panel and dinner event that draws attention to women on the frontlines of global hunger.

 

Here in Boston, women are innovators in building a better food system that provides healthy and sustainable choices.  Join us to celebrate women’s achievements here and worldwide in changing the way we grow, eat, and share food so that everyone has enough to eat, always. Panelists range from local entrepreneurs to a Masaai farmer from Tanzania.

 

Hunger and poverty affect women and men alike but because women make up the majority of those living below the poverty line, they bear the heaviest burdens. Around the world 925 million people do not have enough food to eat, and women and young children are especially vulnerable.

 

This event, organized by Oxfam Action Corps Boston, is free and open to the public.  However, space is limited.  RSVP at hdasilva@oxfamamerica.org.  This event is made possible by a generous grant from the Curtis Fund of the Boston Foundation.

WHO:     

Panelists

 

Anna Oloshuro Kalaita, Masaai farmer from Tanzania

 

Ashley Stanley, Founder, Lovin’ Spoonfuls Inc., Boston

 

Molly Anderson, College of the Atlantic, Partridge Chair in Food & Sustainable Agriculture Systems

 

Melanie Hardy, Farm Manager, Land’s Sake Farm, Weston

 

Keely Curliss, Youth Intern, The Food Project, Boston

 

 

 

Moderator

 

Jennifer Hashley, Director, New Entry Sustainable Farming Project, Tufts University

 

 

WHEN:         

Saturday, March 10, 2012

 

6:00 p.m.

 

 

WHERE:      

Ballroom, Curry Student Center, Northeastern University

 

 

WHY:         

Many think that hunger is about too many people and not enough food. But that’s not the case. Right now we grow enough food to feed everyone yet nearly one billion people go hungry.  Hunger is about power. Its roots lie in the inequalities in access to resources, from water and land, to education and healthcare. Although significant progress has been made since women took to the streets to demand their rights on the first International Women’s Day in 1911, there is still a long way to go to create a truly equal world. This celebration of International Women’s Day is a crucial moment to reflect on our achievements, but also how much further we have to go.

President Obama on Tuesday signed an executive order establishing a center to coordinate federal trade law enforcement efforts.

The Interagency Trade Enforcement Center will work with the Agriculture, Commerce, Homeland Security, Justice, State and Treasury departments, as well as the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to ensure U.S. businesses and workers are protected from unfair trade practices. It will reside in the U.S. Trade Representative’s office, the executive order stated.

“Robust monitoring and enforcement of U.S. rights under international trade agreements, and enforcement of domestic trade laws, are crucial to expanding exports and ensuring U.S. workers, businesses, ranchers and farmers are able to compete on a level playing field with foreign trade partners,” Obama wrote.

The president called for a unit to investigate trade violations as part of his State of the Union address in late January. “I will not stand by when our competitors don’t play by the rules,” he said at the time.

Obama requested $26 million for the center as part of his fiscal 2013 budget, according to a Commerce Department summary.

 

The House and the Senate are in a state of near-paralysis over the country’s finances. Even conservatives—who generally embrace Thoreau’s maxim that the government that governs best governs least—show signs of fear and alarm about the government’s inability to get things done.

The United States has an aging population that is depending on underfunded federal health and pension programs during a time of sluggish economic growth, unrelenting international challenges, soaring debt, and pertinacious division.

“If we keep kicking the can down the road, and ducking … and pushing responsibility off to the next Congress, then we’ll have a European-type situation on our hands: We’ll have a debt crisis,” warns Rep. Paul Ryan, the Republican from Wisconsin who chairs the House Budget Committee. And that procrastination will mean “bitter austerity … sudden, disruptive cuts … slow economic growth … [and huge] tax increases.”

The 2011 National Journal voting ratings offer little cause for optimism. Polarization remains endemic. Lawmakers march in lockstep with their party. Heretics are purged.

For the second year in a row but only the third time in the 30 years that National Journal has published these ratings, no Senate Democrat compiled a voting record to the right of any Senate Republican, and no Republican came down on the left of any Senate Democrat. (The first time this happened was 1999.)

Not Ben Nelson, the Democrat from oh-so-Republican Nebraska. Not Scott Brown, the Republican from the People’s Republic of Massachusetts. Not the soon-departing Joe Lieberman, the independent Democrat from Connecticut, nor the newly arrived Joe Manchin, the conservative Democrat from West Virginia. Not  Olympia Snowe or Susan Collins, the moderate Republican Ladies of Maine.

Ideological mavericks are an extinct breed. The otherwise iconoclastic Tom Coburn of Oklahoma had the most conservative voting record in the Senate (Democrats Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Kirsten Gillibrand of New York were tied for the most liberal), and the old fighter jock himself, John McCain of Arizona, voted more to the right than two-thirds of his GOP colleagues.

The 435 members of the House are as polarized as their Senate colleagues. Only six Republicans—Chris Smith of New Jersey, Tim Johnson of Illinois, Justin Amash of Michigan, Ron Paul of Texas, Steven LaTourette of Ohio, and Walter Jones of North Carolina—compiled a slightly more “liberal” voting record than the most conservative Democrat, Rep. Dan Boren of Oklahoma.

And Ron Paul makes the list only because his libertarianism takes him so far right that on some issues he runs off the screen, Pac-Man like, and pops up on the other side.

Believe it or not, it wasn’t always so. In 1982, when National Journal published its first set of voting ratings, 58 senators—a majority of the 100-member chamber—compiled records that fell between the most conservative Democrat (Edward Zorinsky of Nebraska) and the most liberal Republican (Lowell Weicker of Connecticut). Now it’s zero, zip, nada.

The House in 1982 was chock-full of “Boll Weevils” (conservative Democrats) and “Gypsy Moths” (liberal Republicans). That year’s National Journal ratings found 344 House members whose voting records fell between the most liberal Republican and the most conservative Democrat. Today, the number is 16, up slightly from the seven in that category in 2010 but virtually the same as the 15 “betweeners” in both 2008 and 2009. As recently as 2006, when moderate Republican Jim Leach represented a House district in Iowa, the number was 42. The NJ ratings reflect an ideological sorting of Americans into communities that suit their political tastes: the average scores of members of Congress closely tracked how their districts voted in the 2008 presidential election.

Continued polarization could lead to awful consequences. “The country is in dire straits, and … we are tied down like Gulliver by the Lilliputians .… We can’t do squat,” said Keith Poole, an expert on political polarization from the University of Georgia. “The tea party whack jobs are right: We’re bankrupt.… But we’re just drifting, drifting toward the falls.”

Read the full story at NationalJournal.com

 

The House and the Senate are in a state of near-paralysis over the country’s finances. Even conservatives—who generally embrace Thoreau’s maxim that the government that governs best governs least—show signs of fear and alarm about the government’s inability to get things done.

The United States has an aging population that is depending on underfunded federal health and pension programs during a time of sluggish economic growth, unrelenting international challenges, soaring debt, and pertinacious division.

“If we keep kicking the can down the road, and ducking … and pushing responsibility off to the next Congress, then we’ll have a European-type situation on our hands: We’ll have a debt crisis,” warns Rep. Paul Ryan, the Republican from Wisconsin who chairs the House Budget Committee. And that procrastination will mean “bitter austerity … sudden, disruptive cuts … slow economic growth … [and huge] tax increases.”

The 2011 National Journal voting ratings offer little cause for optimism. Polarization remains endemic. Lawmakers march in lockstep with their party. Heretics are purged.

For the second year in a row but only the third time in the 30 years that National Journal has published these ratings, no Senate Democrat compiled a voting record to the right of any Senate Republican, and no Republican came down on the left of any Senate Democrat. (The first time this happened was 1999.)

Not Ben Nelson, the Democrat from oh-so-Republican Nebraska. Not Scott Brown, the Republican from the People’s Republic of Massachusetts. Not the soon-departing Joe Lieberman, the independent Democrat from Connecticut, nor the newly arrived Joe Manchin, the conservative Democrat from West Virginia. Not  Olympia Snowe or Susan Collins, the moderate Republican Ladies of Maine.

Ideological mavericks are an extinct breed. The otherwise iconoclastic Tom Coburn of Oklahoma had the most conservative voting record in the Senate (Democrats Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Kirsten Gillibrand of New York were tied for the most liberal), and the old fighter jock himself, John McCain of Arizona, voted more to the right than two-thirds of his GOP colleagues.

The 435 members of the House are as polarized as their Senate colleagues. Only six Republicans—Chris Smith of New Jersey, Tim Johnson of Illinois, Justin Amash of Michigan, Ron Paul of Texas, Steven LaTourette of Ohio, and Walter Jones of North Carolina—compiled a slightly more “liberal” voting record than the most conservative Democrat, Rep. Dan Boren of Oklahoma.

And Ron Paul makes the list only because his libertarianism takes him so far right that on some issues he runs off the screen, Pac-Man like, and pops up on the other side.

Believe it or not, it wasn’t always so. In 1982, when National Journal published its first set of voting ratings, 58 senators—a majority of the 100-member chamber—compiled records that fell between the most conservative Democrat (Edward Zorinsky of Nebraska) and the most liberal Republican (Lowell Weicker of Connecticut). Now it’s zero, zip, nada.

The House in 1982 was chock-full of “Boll Weevils” (conservative Democrats) and “Gypsy Moths” (liberal Republicans). That year’s National Journal ratings found 344 House members whose voting records fell between the most liberal Republican and the most conservative Democrat. Today, the number is 16, up slightly from the seven in that category in 2010 but virtually the same as the 15 “betweeners” in both 2008 and 2009. As recently as 2006, when moderate Republican Jim Leach represented a House district in Iowa, the number was 42. The NJ ratings reflect an ideological sorting of Americans into communities that suit their political tastes: the average scores of members of Congress closely tracked how their districts voted in the 2008 presidential election.

Continued polarization could lead to awful consequences. “The country is in dire straits, and … we are tied down like Gulliver by the Lilliputians .… We can’t do squat,” said Keith Poole, an expert on political polarization from the University of Georgia. “The tea party whack jobs are right: We’re bankrupt.… But we’re just drifting, drifting toward the falls.”

Read the full story at NationalJournal.com

Powered by WordPress and Motion by 85ideas.