Tag Archive: group


BIG TURNAROUND: Chrysler Group LLC turned its first annual net income since 1997. It emerged from bankruptcy in mid-2009.

BY THE NUMBERS: Net income totaled $183 million in 2011, compared with a loss of $652 million in 2010. Revenue rose 31 percent from a year earlier to $55 billion, reflecting stronger sales. Chrysler rode 16 new or revamped models to success during 2011. U.S. sales rose 26 percent and were led by the Ram pickup and Jeep Grand Cherokee SUV.

THE FORECAST: CEO Sergio Marchionne says he’s optimistic about 2012 and beyond. The company is forecasting net income of about $1.5 billion in 2012 on revenue of around $65 billion. Marchionne promises more new products for 2013.

MILAN – Fiat Group SpA, which controls Chrysler LLC, has reported that full-year earnings more than doubled as Chrysler posted its first profit since 1997.

The company says it made euro1.3 billion ($1.71 billion) in net profit last year, compared with euro520 million a year earlier, as revenue rose 66 percent to euro59.5 billion.

The results exceeded the company’s guidance. Fiat’s trading profit — or earnings before interest, taxes and one-time items — was euro2.3 billion, exceeding the target of more than euro2.1 billion.

Fiat said Wednesday that the results reflected higher Chrysler sales, resilient Fiat Group Auto revenues and double-digit growth at the Ferrari luxury brand.

Under a new law, participants in the Veterans Group Life Insurance Program will now have an opportunity to beef up their coverage, the Veterans Affairs Department has announced.

As a part of the 2010 Veterans’ Benefits Act, they can receive the equivalent of the maximum coverage available under the Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance Program. This means veterans can step up their coverage by $25,000 in five-year intervals from the date their policy began. The maximum SGLI coverage is $400,000.

According to a VA press release, only 21 percent of eligible veterans have taken advantage of the increase.

“Currently, 70 percent of the veterans covered under VGLI are under age 60, have less than $400,000 of coverage, and will greatly benefit from this law change,” Allison Hickey, the department’s undersecretary for benefits, said in a statement earlier this month.

To be eligible, veterans must be younger than 60 on the five-year anniversary date of their coverage and currently receive less than the maximum coverage. Veterans are covered regardless of their health.

Those interested must make a request during the 120-day period prior to their five-year anniversary.

ING Group (NYSE: INGNews) will not pay dividends and earnings will not be its first priority. Scary, I know, but don’t panic. The bank plans to stick to this strategy till it accomplishes three things — repay the government, fulfill Basel III norms, and complete the restructuring of its balance sheet. In ING CEO Jan Hommen’s words, right now, boosting capital and liquidity are the bank’s main priorities.

Let’s try to understand ING’s short-term strategy and its consequences.

Meet Basel III norms
Under the new Basel III regulations that took effect in 2012, ING will need to maintain a core tier 1 ratio of 10% in order to weather economic storms. Restrictions have been put on the number of risky investments as well. The need to raise a buffer will affect the bank’s ability to utilize capital, generate returns, and improve margins.

Repay the government
During the 2008 crisis, ING received $12.8 billion in aid from the Dutch government. Though the bank has paid back a substantial portion of this debt, it still has another $3.8 billion remaining. It had earlier intended to repay the state by May this year, but those plans have been put on the back burner. Until ING manages to shore up its reserves, it won’t be able to pay back the state. The bailout didn’t come without riders.

One of the conditions set by the European Commission was that the bank will have to cut its balance sheet by almost half to ensure there are fewer risky investments on its books. As long as ING is tied to the government, it can’t look at acquisitions as an avenue for growth. It also may not be able to take on risky investments, which otherwise could have garnered higher returns. Thus, the first thing it has to do is restructure its balance sheet.

Restructure the books
ING plans to do this by divesting its global insurance business and shrinking its exposure to debt-ridden countries. It recently concluded the divestment of its Latin American insurance wing for a net gain of nearly $1.26 billion. Next on the auction table could be its Asian insurance arm, which some analysts are valuing at a little more than $6 billion.

When it comes to reducing its exposure in debt-ridden countries, the bank reduced its exposure by some $5 billion last year, but it still has another $2.5 billion tied up in the troubled nations of Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain. So there is still a sizable portion of risk on its books.

The takeaway
2011 was a tough year for European banks, and there aren’t too many indications that 2012 will be any better. Hommen expects markets to be “difficult” and “volatile” in 2012 as well. He thinks from 2013, ING will be able to maintain a core capital ratio of 10% and also use the excess capital in hand to repay the government. But 2013 is still a long way off and given the sovereign debt crisis, plenty could go wrong.

ING’s earnings forecast doesn’t look great, and it is also not paying out dividends. Shareholders may not enjoy it, but that may be the right move for the bank in the long term.

INDIANAPOLIS – UnitedHealth Group says its fourth-quarter net income jumped 21 percent, trumping Wall Street expectations, as the insurer saw enrollment and revenue gains.

The company, based in Minnetonka, Minn., says it earned $1.26 billion, or $1.17 per share, in the three months that ended Dec. 31. That’s up from $1.04 billion, or 94 cents per share, in the same quarter last year.

Revenue grew 8 percent to $25.92 billion. Enrollment rose 5 percent to 34.6 million people.

Analysts had forecast earnings of $1.03 per share on $25.64 billion in revenue.

UnitedHealth is the largest health insurer based on revenue and the first to report earnings every quarter. Many see the company as a bellwether for managed-care companies.

INDIANAPOLIS – UnitedHealth Group Inc.’s fourth-quarter net income jumped 20 percent and trumped Wall Street expectations, but the insurer left its 2012 earnings forecast unchanged as it saw signs of health care use starting to pick back up.

The Minnetonka, Minn., company said Thursday it earned $1.26 billion, or $1.17 per share, in the three months that ended Dec. 31. That’s up from $1.04 billion, or 94 cents per share, in the same quarter last year.

Revenue grew 8 percent to $25.92 billion.

Analysts surveyed by FactSet had forecast, on average, earnings of $1.03 per share on $25.64 billion in revenue.

The insurer repeated a 2012 forecast that calls for earnings to range between $4.55 to $4.75 per share on revenue of between $107 billion and $108 billion. Analysts have labeled that forecast conservative. They expect, on average, earnings of $4.77 per share.

UnitedHealth is the largest health insurer based on revenue and the first to report earnings every quarter. Many see the company as a bellwether for managed-care companies.

The insurer said its enrollment climbed 5 percent compared to the 2010 quarter to 34.6 million people, helped in part by Medicare Advantage growth. Those are privately run versions of the government’s Medicare program for the elderly and disabled people. UnitedHealth is the largest provider of Medicare Advantage plans, and enrollment in that insurance is expected to grow as the baby boomer generation ages and becomes eligible for the plans.

UnitedHealth’s medical costs also climbed 8 percent to $18.6 billion compared with the final quarter of 2010, when the insurer said it saw unusually low growth in health care use.

Insurers have been helped in recent quarters by health care use that has risen at rates that were slower than expected when they set premiums. Analyst see signs that this trend is continuing, but UnitedHealth CEO Stephen Hemsley warned last fall he expected use to return to more normal levels.

For the full year, UnitedHealth earned $5.14 billion, or $4.73 per share, on $101.9 billion in revenue.

CHICAGO, Dec. 6, 2011 /CHICAGOPRESSRELEASE.COM/ – UHC has created a comprehensive Reprocessing Guide for members that participate in its Value Analysis Program. The guide is a practical manual for planning, implementing, and managing all phases of a reprocessing program for single-use medical devices and equipment.

UHC’s Value Analysis Program helps academic medical centers manage and implement clinical and operational improvement and cost reduction activities. Program participants that apply value analysis best practices achieve an average return on investment of 10:1 or higher.

The new guide, third in a series of Value Analysis Program handbooks, incorporates technical information, tips, and best practices for reprocessing, which can result in improved patient care, financial sustainability, and environmental sustainability. The guide incorporates input from leaders in reprocessing both within and outside UHC.

“In this challenging climate of health care reform, it’s critical to find opportunities for cost reduction and increased efficiencies, while maintaining the highest standards of patient care,” said Jake Groenewold, UHC senior vice president, Supply Chain. “Reprocessing can be an important element in this strategy, and it also supports members’ green initiatives.”

UHC’s Value Analysis Program also offers the Value Analysis Handbook, the Technology Assessment Guide, 2 meetings and 10 Web conferences each year, and an active networking group. UHC will soon launch a reprocessing special interest group for program participants.

About UHC

UHC is an alliance of the nation’s leading nonprofit academic medical centers, which are focused on delivering world-class patient care. Based in Chicago, Ill, UHC fosters collaboration with and among its 115 academic medical center and 258 affiliated hospital members through its renowned programs and services in the areas of comparative data and analytics, performance improvement, supply chain management, strategic research, and public policy. UHC helps its members achieve excellence in quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness. Formed in 1984, UHC’s membership includes more than 90% of the nonprofit academic medical centers in the United States. For more information, visit uhc.edu.

SOURCE UHC


http://www.uhc.edu

UHC Releases Reprocessing Guide for Value Analysis Program | Chicago Press Release Services – Chicago’s leading press release newswire service; professional press release services, press release distribution and newswire services.



Press release distribution via Chicago Press Release Services

A New York City community organizing group that received a Justice Department grant to teach students leadership skills failed to follow requirements for documenting its spending, according to a report the Justice inspector general’s office released Wednesday.

The $138,130 grant awarded in 2005 to the New York Agency for Community Affairs was to be used to sustain the grass-roots organizing efforts of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, known as ACORN, which filed for bankruptcy in 2010 after Congress cut off federal funding.

Acting IG Cynthia Schnedar said her team questioned the entire grant awarded by the Office of Justice Programs’ Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. “Our audit found that there were internal control weaknesses; unsupported grant expenditures; a lack of contractor monitoring; weaknesses in budget management; inadequate grant reporting; unmet conditions, including a requirement to request prior OJP approval before using grant funds to advocate for any law, regulation or policy; and deficiencies with the program’s overall performance,” she said in a statement.

The report also described the New York group as a “pass-through entity” for ACORN, a politically controversial neighborhood activist group that conservatives believe is a tool of the Democratic Party.

“While NYACA’s OJP-approved budget was for the allocation of grant funds to payroll and fringe benefit charges,” the report said, “we determined NYACA did not have any paid employees at the time it received the grant or at any time during the life of the grant-funded project. All of the individuals who worked on behalf of NYACA were ACORN employees. Further, the former NYACA executive director stated that she served concurrently as the executive director for both NYACA and the New York branch of ACORN.”

The group’s original grant application promised “to identify and recruit potential leaders, such as block association officers, parent organization leaders and other neighborhood-based activists to accomplish its organizational and grant-related goals,” the IG report stated.

The report made 11 recommendations for the community group to revamp its accounting procedures and reporting, both for the grant in question and for any future grants. “Unsupported progress reports hinder overseers’ ability to monitor grant activity and increase the risk for grant funds to be wasted or used for unallowable purposes,” the report said. “Because we could not determine whether the reports submitted by NYACA were accurate, we recommend that NYACA implement policies and procedures to ensure the submission of fully supported, accurate and timely reports for future DoJ awards.”

Though ACORN was officially defunded, grants routed to groups some view as its offshoots have continued to generate controversy, as occurred earlier this year when the Housing and Urban Development Department gave $80,000 to the Affordable Housing Centers of America.

“This is the latest in a series of nonpartisan audits showing taxpayer money is being abused and wasted in Justice Department grant programs,” Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said in a statement to Government Executive. “More transparency and accountability by the Justice Department and the grantees is needed to ensure taxpayer dollars are spent in accordance with the program goals. There’s zero reason to waste tax dollars like this, especially in this economic climate.”

One of ACORN’s chief critics is the conservative research group Judicial Watch. Asked about Wednesday’s report, Thomas Fitton, the group’s president, told Government Executive: “It took three years to find out what everyone has known for years, that this is a typical activity by ACORN, fraudulent and involving federal monies. You can see how the money was used for political purposes, not for the stated purposes.”

Judicial Watch has published reports on what Fitton describes as ACORN’s “series of front groups designed to thwart oversight — not that the government needs help having its oversight thwarted.” He called for a comprehensive audit of the Office of Justice Programs and said the fact that such groups “continue to get money in violation of the law screams out for a comprehensive criminal investigation.”

More than half of federal managers believe the super committee should cut programs to save money and reduce the number of government contractors, according to a new survey from Government Executive Media Group.

Eight-four percent of respondents supported shrinking the contractor workforce to save money and more than half identified duplicative processes and waste in their agencies that could be eliminated to improve efficiency. While federal managers are in favor of scaling back costs, they are worried about impending budget cuts and do not want their pay and benefits targeted to help reduce the deficit.

“Paying more into their pensions, reducing the salary used to calculate annuities, further freezing pay and raising health care premiums are unacceptable to the majority of managers,” said the report accompanying the survey. Still, 45 percent reported they would support higher employee contributions to pensions, while 37 percent were in favor of an additional pay freeze. Thirty-four percent endorsed paying higher health care premiums.

The survey, conducted in September, included 814 respondents at the GS 11-15 levels as well as members of the Senior Executive Service. The Government Business Council, the research arm of Government Executive, conducted the study.

Federal managers advocate a reduction in contractors, but they do not think that is probable. Twenty percent said such layoffs are “not at all likely,” while 19 percent responded that fewer contractors were “slightly likely,” or “moderately likely.” Respondents also favored limiting the number of new federal hires as a way to save money — a finding that could help supporters of a bill circulating in Congress to reduce the workforce through attrition by 10 percent by 2015.

Sixty-eight percent of respondents said agencies were ripe for cuts when it comes to eliminating waste and redundancy in government programs and processes. Managers mentioned overhauling administration practices, consolidating offices and reining in training expenses. Many cited the complicated nature of working with other agencies in particular as an obstacle to efficiency. Only 18 percent of managers included in the survey described agency interactions as cooperative. Respondents, however, rated their own programs highly in terms of innovation, efficiency and fulfilling public need.

An overwhelming number of respondents (81 percent) expected their fiscal 2013 budgets to decrease and are concerned that “without proper funding, we will not be able to maintain service,” the report stated. The expected budget cuts are stoking fears among managers of lower employee morale. Seventy-five percent of respondents who supervise at least one employee are concerned or very concerned that budget cuts will lower workforce morale and hurt productivity.

More than half of federal managers believe the super committee should cut programs to save money and reduce the number of government contractors, according to a new survey from Government Executive Media Group.

Eight-four percent of respondents supported shrinking the contractor workforce to save money and more than half identified duplicative processes and waste in their agencies that could be eliminated to improve efficiency. While federal managers are in favor of scaling back costs, they are worried about impending budget cuts and do not want their pay and benefits targeted to help reduce the deficit.

“Paying more into their pensions, reducing the salary used to calculate annuities, further freezing pay and raising health care premiums are unacceptable to the majority of managers,” said the report accompanying the survey. Still, 45 percent reported they would support higher employee contributions to pensions, while 37 percent were in favor of an additional pay freeze. Thirty-four percent endorsed paying higher health care premiums.

The survey, conducted in September, included 814 respondents at the GS 11-15 levels as well as members of the Senior Executive Service. The Government Business Council, the research arm of Government Executive, conducted the study.

Federal managers advocate a reduction in contractors, but they do not think that is probable. Twenty percent said such layoffs are “not at all likely,” while 19 percent responded that fewer contractors were “slightly likely,” or “moderately likely.” Respondents also favored limiting the number of new federal hires as a way to save money — a finding that could help supporters of a bill circulating in Congress to reduce the workforce through attrition by 10 percent by 2015.

Sixty-eight percent of respondents said agencies were ripe for cuts when it comes to eliminating waste and redundancy in government programs and processes. Managers mentioned overhauling administration practices, consolidating offices and reining in training expenses. Many cited the complicated nature of working with other agencies in particular as an obstacle to efficiency. Only 18 percent of managers included in the survey described agency interactions as cooperative. Respondents, however, rated their own programs highly in terms of innovation, efficiency and fulfilling public need.

An overwhelming number of respondents (81 percent) expected their fiscal 2013 budgets to decrease and are concerned that “without proper funding, we will not be able to maintain service,” the report stated. The expected budget cuts are stoking fears among managers of lower employee morale. Seventy-five percent of respondents who supervise at least one employee are concerned or very concerned that budget cuts will lower workforce morale and hurt productivity.

Powered by WordPress and Motion by 85ideas.