Tag Archive: federal


President Obama will nominate Joseph Jordan, a senior Office of Management and Budget official, to head the Office of Federal Procurement Policy, the White House announced Friday.

The post has been vacant since Dan Gordon left the administration in November.

Jordan has been a senior adviser to OMB Acting Director Jeffrey Zients since December 2011. Before that, he was associate administrator for government contracting and business development at the Small Business Administration. Prior to serving in government, he worked at management consulting firm McKinsey & Co.

From 1998 to 2000, Jordan was an associate producer on MSNBC’s Hardball with Chris Matthews

Observers had speculated Jordan might be slated for the procurement post after he joined OMB late last year. But the agency has been mum on who would fill the position in Gordon’s absence.

Gordon left the OFPP job  to become associate dean for government contracts law at the George Washington University Law School.

BOSTON – The Federal Reserve is making it increasingly hard for investors to earn anything, unless they’re willing to accept plenty of risk. Ben Bernanke and his Fed are playing the role of adviser, encouraging Americans to get a little more adventurous by shifting savings out of low-yielding bonds and putting it to work in stocks.

The latest nudge came last week when the Fed said it doesn’t expect to raise its benchmark rate until late 2014, at the earliest, because the economic recovery remains fragile. Rates have been near zero since December 2008. The latest extension means borrowers can expect another three years of low-cost loans and mortgages.

However, it’s more bad news for savers and retirees depending on investment income, particularly when there’s 3 percent inflation. Investors who value earning stable returns from Treasury bonds end up with little more than satisfaction that they’re faring better than people keeping money in traditional savings accounts.

Consider that investors committing to lock up their money for a full decade were only being paid 1.8 percent for buying U.S. Treasurys this week. And yields have turned negative for investors trading 10-year Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, or TIPS. On Wednesday, the yield was negative 0.28 percent. In essence, investors are willing to pay Uncle Sam to borrow their dollars for 10 years, because the opportunity to minimize losses is attractive compared with other options.

That may be patriotic if the government puts that borrowed cash to work to stimulate the economy. But it’s no way to invest for your future.

“I don’t know why people would pay the U.S. government to borrow their money, unless they’re very, very pessimistic,” says Robert Horrocks, chief investment officer and a portfolio manager with the Matthews Asia mutual funds.

Returns are even smaller for money-market funds, safe harbors where investors can park their cash until they’re ready to put it back into the market. Money fund returns are closely tied to interest rates, and their returns have been barely above zero for three years. They’re now averaging 0.02 percent — call it nothing. Don’t expect improvement until the Fed pushes rates back up.

Here’s a look at three relatively low-risk alternatives to generate some income in a low interest rate environment:

1. Dividend stocks

Dick Bristol, a 74-year-old retired Air Force major from Biloxi, Miss., counts on dividend-paying stocks for his retirement security. His investment portfolio is nearly 100 percent in stocks that make regular payouts, and he and his wife count on a few hundred dollars of dividends coming in each month.

Of course, dividend-paying stocks are not immune from market drops. And companies often cut dividends when the economy skids. But Bristol is convinced the potential returns are worth the risks. In August, he invested in Dynex Capital, a real estate investment trust. The stock has since risen 8 percent and has a high dividend yield of 12 percent. That’s the amount of the dividend paid divided by the share price.

“Keep in mind that if you invest in something that’s earning 1 to 2 percent, you’re losing out to the 3 inflation we’ve got now,” Bristol says. “Over the long run, nothing pays like dividend stocks.”

2. High-yield bonds

These bonds are issued by companies with credit problems. High-yield investors expect higher returns because there’s a greater risk of default than with companies possessing investment-grade ratings. And they’ve gotten them recently. Mutual funds specializing in high-yield bonds have produced an average annualized return of 19 percent over the last 3-years.

Anne Lester, lead manager of JPMorgan Income Builder (JNBAX), has recently been adding to the fund’s holdings in high-yield bonds. They now make up 44 percent of a portfolio that also is invested in stocks. Corporate default rates remain low and high-yields are attractively priced compared with Treasurys and other bonds, Lester says.

The market is pricing high-yield bonds “as if we were in a recession, and we’re clearly not in one,” she says.

But high-yield bond investors face plenty of risks. Chief among them is the possibility that Europe’s debt problems spin out of control. That could put the domestic economic recovery at risk, potentially leading to a spike in corporate defaults and losses for high-yield investors.

3. Municipal bonds

Investments in the bonds of state and local governments typically won’t make you rich, because returns are generally low. But muni bond interest payments are exempt from federal taxes. That protection may extend to state taxes if the munis are issued by the state in which the investor lives. Investors can pocket attractive returns even after taxes, because the tax hit can be sizeable for those in higher income brackets.

Muni bond funds have been on a terrific run, with average returns of nearly 15 percent over the last 12 months. But don’t expect double-digit returns this year. Muni bond prices have rebounded from a market scare in late 2010, when the poor financial condition of many states and cities left investors nervous about a surge of defaults. Although many governments remain troubled, there has been no default surge and municipal bankruptcies declined last year, says Jim Colby, a muni bond analyst with Van Eck Associates.

A setback for the economic recovery could put more pressure on government budgets. But Colby says munis remain an attractive alternative to Treasurys. He’s expecting muni returns to average 4 to 5 percent over the next few years.

“Munis give an investor opportunity,” he says, “at a time when so many are saying, `Boy, I’m having a hard time stomaching these low Treasury yields.’”

___

Questions? E-mail investorinsight(at)ap.org

Seeking to level the playing field for small businesses in federal contracting, the chairman of a House subcommittee on Thursday introduced a bill to “give small contractors a voice when their work is being unfairly insourced,” a reference to the Obama administration’s three-year effort to rely less on contractors in federal procurement.

Rep. Mick Mulvaney, R-S.C., leader of the Small Business Subcommittee on Contracting and Workforce, said his Subcontracting Transparency and Reliability (STAR) Act is needed because “there are many unfair roadblocks that exist for many small businesses who perform federal contracting work. When contracts are set aside for small businesses in order to foster job creation, competition, innovation and a healthy industrial base, the government has a vested interest in ensuring that the small business performs a significant portion of the work, otherwise, the small business could deceitfully pass through the work to a large contractor.”

The STAR act, Mulvaney said, would help firms that might not otherwise have the means to fight “deceitful” subcontracting and unjustified insourcing.

“Small business contracting and subcontracting is a great way to support local businesses who are more than capable of providing a great product or service for the federal government in an efficient manner,” he added.

Specifically, the bill would change current limitations on subcontracting provisions designed to ensure that small businesses that get contracts are doing the bulk of the work, while making it easier to crack down on “d deceptive large businesses hiding behind small businesses” and for “legitimate small businesses to comply with limitations by tracking price rather than cost.”

It would allow more small businesses to team together to compete for federal contract, and would seek to make it easier to catch bad actors by “easing the detection and punishment of large businesses that fail to file the mandatory reports on the use of small business subcontractors.”

And it would attempt to make insourcing more transparent by requiring agencies to publish their insourcing processes and giving small business contractors standing to challenge insourcing decisions in court.

The bill comes the same week that President Obama proposed a package of tax breaks to help small firms grow.

WASHINGTON – The heads of the Federal Reserve’s 12 regional banks have for the first time released financial disclosure data, which suggest a wide disparity in their wealth.

Richard Fisher, head of the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank, listed three real estate holdings each valued in excess of $1 million: a 176-acre Texas ranch, 311 undeveloped acres in Georgia and 2,076 acres in Montgomery City, Texas.

Esther George, who took over last year at the Kansas City Fed, disclosed that her most expensive asset, estimated between $250,000 to $500,000, was one-half ownership of a farm in St. Joseph, Mo.

The filings, like those for members of Congress, didn’t list specific amounts for the assets, only ranges.

The regional banks released the documents after Bloomberg News filed a Freedom of Information Act request. The banks maintained that the information isn’t covered by FOIA rules. On their websites, they said it was being released voluntarily, “to promote transparency and in response to media interest.”

William Dudley, president of the New York Fed, listed holdings in excess of $1 million in inflation-protected Treasury bonds, a retirement fund and a Vanguard Treasury bond fund. Dudley was a top executive at Goldman Sachs before joining the Fed.

James Bullard, the president of the St. Louis Fed, listed no assets that he needed to report.

Beyond the range in their wealth, the regional bank presidents’ assets are of varying degrees of complexity. Dudley’s filing was 190 pages; George’s was six. George has spent her career at the Kansas City Fed, starting as a bank examiner in 1982.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and other members of the Fed’s seven-member board in Washington are subject to disclosure requirements. These officials release annual financial statements. The Fed board members are nominated by the president and must be confirmed by the Senate.

Bernanke earns $199,700, the same as a Cabinet secretary. The other members of the Fed’s board earn $179,700.

By contrast, the regional bank presidents are selected by the boards of the individual Fed banks, though they must be approved by the Fed board in Washington.

The regional bank chiefs aren’t subject to the federal salary caps that apply to Bernanke and the other Fed board members. The regional banks’ boards set their salaries.

All 12 bank presidents are paid more than Bernanke. The head of the New York Fed is the highest-paid official, earning more than $410,000.

According to the Fed’s annual report, the lowest salary among the 12 regional bank presidents was $281,000 paid to Bullard.

House Small Business Committee Chairman Sam Graves, R-Mo., on Wednesday introduced legislation to encourage a higher percentage of federal contracts to go to small business, along with a separate bill to elevate agency Offices of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization.

Graves’ GET Small Business Contracting Act would raise the small business prime contracting goal from the current 23 percent to 25 percent, while withholding bonuses from agency managers who fail to meet the goal. He estimates the 2 percent increase would bring $11 billion in new federal contracts to small businesses. The government spent about $535 billion in contracting in fiscal 2010, according to the Office of Management and Budget.

“Because the federal government spends half a trillion dollars on contracted goods and services, we owe it to the taxpayers to make sure their money is used wisely and efficiently,” Graves said in a statement. “Government contracting offers a unique opportunity to invest in small businesses while also stimulating our economy, considering small businesses create the majority of jobs — 65 percent over the last 17 years. Small businesses have proved time and time again that they can perform a service or produce goods for the government cheaper and often quicker than their larger counterparts; however, various bureaucratic impediments remain for small contractors.”

The Obama administration missed its small business contracting goal by 3 percent in 2010, according to Graves. His bill also would seek to use more small businesses as subcontractors, raising the goal from the current 35 percent of subcontracted dollars to 40 percent.

Graves is also offering a second bill, the Small Business Advocate Act, that would promote greater use of contractors, prime and sub, at each agency’s Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization.

OSDBUs were created in 1978 to reserve some federal contracts for for-profit small business concerns in which socially and economically disadvantaged individuals own at least a 51 percent interest and manage and control daily business operations. Their director’s place in the hierarchy has varied by agency.

The Graves bill would elevate those directors to senior acquisition leaders and prohibit them from holding any other position “so they can concentrate on their advocacy responsibilities,” a statement said. “This legislation makes it easier for the OSDBU to advocate for small business contracts, focus on acquisition assistance, and fight insourcing and unjustified contract bundling.”

This bill would require directors to be GS-15s or members of the Senior Executive Service and their performance reviews to be done by agency heads. “Acting as the OSDBU director,” Graves said, “is often simply another assigned duty for a senior official that lacks the authority to challenge decisions made by the chief acquisition officer or senior procurement executive.”

In April 2010, President Obama set up a task force to boost small business contracting opportunities.

The Graves bills come on a day when President Obama is releasing a package of proposed tax breaks for small businesses, including elimination of taxes on capital gains for investments in small businesses.

The House plans to vote this week on a bill that would extend the pay freeze for federal employees and lawmakers — a move opposed by the White House and labor unions for its content and its process.

The bill, H.R. 3835, introduced earlier this month by Rep. Sean Duffy, R-Wis., would extend the pay freeze for an additional year.

The proposal runs in opposition to the Obama administration’s announcement earlier this month that the president would recommend giving civilian federal employees a 0.5 percent raise in fiscal 2013.

The vote on H.R. 3835 will take place under a suspension of the rules, a legislative procedure that allows for a vote on a bill without opportunity for public comment or amendment. Congress typically uses the process on non-controversial bills with bipartisan support.

The measure also extends the salary freeze for members of Congress, with no changes or cost of living adjustments available to lawmakers until the end of 2013. In a letter to all House members Monday, National Treasury Employees Union President Colleen M. Kelley called this a “politically disingenuous” move.

“Clearly, this bill . . . is a political ploy setting up a Hobson’s choice that would require representatives to vote against extending the freeze for themselves in order to lift the freeze on federal employees,” she wrote.

Kelley argued that federal workers are making a $60 billion contribution over 10 years to reducing the federal deficit under the current pay freeze. The House voted in December 2011 to extend the current payroll tax cut for a year, partly through prolonging a salary freeze for federal employees and lawmakers and requiring both groups to contribute more to their pensions.

Federal employees with advanced degrees earn less than their private sector peers in combined pay and benefits, but those who only have bachelor’s degrees do better, according to a new study from the Congressional Budget Office.

The study, requested by Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee, found that the average federal employee with a doctorate or professional degree made 18 percent less in wages and benefits combined than private sector counterparts, while the typical government worker with a bachelor’s degree made 15 percent more.

The differential was even greater for those with a high school diploma or less: those public servants earned 36 percent more in the public sector.

For the full CBO report, click here.

A federal audit that found the Defense Department cannot account for nearly $2 billion in Iraqi funds is likely to fuel Baghdad’s interest in pursuing a claim against Washington for failing to handle its money responsibly, the special inspector-general for Iraq reconstruction Stuart Bowen told National Journal.

An audit published on Sunday investigated the roughly $3 billion the Iraqi government gave the Defense Department to pay bills for contracts the Coalition Provisional Authority awarded before it dissolved in 2004. Most of these funds were deposited into an account at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Even though DOD was responsible for maintaining the proper documentation, it could only account for $1 billion of the money.

“Its systematic of the poor record keeping that was rife throughout the early stages of the reconstruction effort,” Bowen, who has conducted three other major audits into the original pot of roughly $21 billion in Iraqi funds the U.S. managed in 2003 and 2004, said.

The latest audit, released weeks after the last U.S. troops pulled out of the country, could stoke tensions between Washington and Baghdad. “There have been threats in the past by the Iraqi government that they may seek recompense in the form of filing against the United States for what they view as an abuse of fiduciary duty,” Bowen said.

“I expect this latest report will simply increase interest on their side in filing such a claim… [and] fuel the continued concern on the part of the government of Iraq about the failure of the reconstruction program managers to maintain adequate records regarding the use of Iraqi funds.”

Bowen traveled to Iraq in November to brief a special commission created by Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, formed last year to obtain a complete accounting for all Iraqi funds deposited in the accounts at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The committee aims to return any unspent funds still under U.S. control to Iraq. Iraq’s Justice Minister, during a private meeting, indicated the Iraqis continue to explore the possibility of filing a claim, Bowen said.

In recent weeks, Baghdad has begun hassling Western contractors, many of them hired to train and assist Iraqi security forces, even temporarily detaining dozens on the pretense their visas are invalid. This has disrupted the movement of supplies and personnel around the country. Bowen says his own staff in-country has had some challenges with food supplies and he’s heard accounts of “meager offerings” at the American embassy because of interference with convoys that have been held up due to instability.

All that’s just an “inconvenience,” Bowen said. The bigger worry amid the turmoil and violence ongoing in the country is for the success of the State Department’s police development program in Iraq, which has had difficulty moving personnel around the country to train Iraqis. “That of course means that the program is not succeeding certainly at the levels hoped for yet,” he said.

WASHINGTON – Federal regulators have filed civil charges against a trader in Latvia whom they accuse of hacking into U.S. customers’ online brokerage accounts and driving prices of more than 100 stocks up or down by making unauthorized trades.

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced charges Thursday against Igors Nagaicevs, a 34-year old Latvian citizen. The SEC also accused four online trading firms and eight executives of the firms of enabling Nagaicevs’ scheme by allowing him anonymous access to the markets. Nagaicevs couldn’t be located for comment.

The SEC said the scheme, allegedly conducted from June 2009 to August 2010, caused customer losses of more than $2 million, which were reimbursed by the firms. It netted Nagaicevs about $850,000 in illegal profits, the agency said. It is seeking unspecified fines and restitution.

Most commodities rallied for a second day Thursday on the latest signs that the U.S. economy is building momentum.

Investors were encouraged by an increase in orders for long-lasting manufactured goods. But a primary driver of the rally was the Federal Reserve’s announcement Wednesday that it will keep interest rates near zero until 2014 to aid the economic recovery.

The policy is expected to cause the dollar to weaken against other currencies. Commodities are priced in dollars so a weaker dollar makes them cheaper for investors who use other currencies.

Metals, wheat, beans and most energy products rose. Natural gas fell 4.2 percent.

The Commerce Department said orders for products expected to last at least three years rose 3 percent in December. That could mean stronger demand for materials used to manufacture products, including copper, platinum and palladium.

In addition, the department said its index of leading economic indicators, a gauge of future economic activity, rose 0.4 percent last month, compared with a 0.2 percent increase in November.

However, the U.S. economy still faces challenges related to Europe’s debt crisis and slower growth in Asia. The Federal Reserve expects the U.S. economic recovery to continue at a slow pace.

Country Hedging LLC analyst Sterling Smith said the central bank’s policy will prompt investors to step up their search for ways to make profits because low-interest rates typically push bond yields lower. That should benefit commodities.

“It appears if we can avoid any major financial hiccups, we could be looking at a strong (commodities) market for throughout the balance of the year,” he said.

In metals trading, gold for February delivery rose $26.60 to finish at $1,726.70 an ounce. April platinum increased $37.20 to end at $1,616.80 an ounce.

In March metals contracts, silver rose 62.2 cents to $33.743 an ounce, copper increased 7.2 cents to $3.9015 per pound and palladium ended up $1.10 at $694.45 an ounce.

Benchmark oil increased 30 cents to end at $99.70 per barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Heating oil rose 3.42 cents to finish at $3.0446 per gallon, gasoline futures rose 1.34 cents to $2.8508 per gallon and natural gas fell 11.5 cents to $2.654 per 1,000 cubic feet.

In March agriculture contracts, wheat rose 12.25 cents to end at $6.535 per bushel, corn was unchanged at $6.345 per bushel and soybeans increased 9.25 cents to $12.2275 per bushel.

Powered by WordPress and Motion by 85ideas.