Tag Archive: executive


Thirty-three federal employees are finalists for the 2012 Service to America Medals for their outstanding achievements in a range of fields including health, national security, disaster management and law enforcement.

“The Service to America Medal finalists epitomize the true spirit and value of public service,” said Max Stier, president and chief executive officer of the Partnership for Public Service, the organization behind the awards. “Their stories showcase the good that our public servants do each and every day behind-the-scenes on behalf of the American public.” The Partnership will hand out medals in nine categories at an annual gala in Washington on Sept. 13.

Winners receive cash awards ranging from $3,000 to $10,000.

The 2012 finalists were selected from among more than 400 nominations and represent several agencies and departments across government, including Agriculture, Defense, Education, Health and Human Services, Justice, and Veterans Affairs. Twenty-eight finalists are from the Washington area; others work in Atlanta, Houston, Utah and Germany.

The honorees’ achievements include:

  • Developing an innovative rehabilitation program to help wounded warrior amputees lead active lives and potentially return to duty
  • Preparing staff at U.S. embassies and consulates to protect and evacuate Americans caught in uprisings, wars and natural disasters
  • Overseeing the cost-effective acquisition and procurement of military equipment for warfighters
  • Reducing homelessness among veterans by 12 percent in one year
  • Leading a governmentwide campaign against bullying
  • Recovering thousands of historical documents stolen from the National Archives
  • Creating an electronic system to track medical treatment of disaster victims and to monitor emerging health threats
  • Studying ways to prevent and treat the growing epidemic of type 2 diabetes in children

Click here for a full list of finalists.

As General Services Administration executive Jeff Neely gains infamy on Capitol Hill for his role in the agency’s 2010 Las Vegas conference scandal, one lawmaker wants to see Neely’s pay cut off, along with that of future federal executives who land in hot water.

Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Pa., a member of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, decried the fact GSA still pays the Region 9 Public Buildings Service commissioner, currently under investigation for his role in planning the $820,000 conference, as well as for accusations that he stole iPods and other personal electronics from GSA.

“There are no mechanisms available to GSA to remove the individuals from the payroll while the disciplinary process progresses,” the agency’s Office of Congressional Affairs told Kelly.

In a Thursday post for The Hill’s Congress blog, Kelly promised to propose legislation to give federal agencies the discretion to freeze the pay of senior executives under investigation for wrongdoing until they have been cleared or convicted. If cleared, Kelly wrote, the executives would receive back pay plus interest.

“Mr. Neely’s continued compensation throughout this investigation only adds insult to injury,” Kelly wrote. “The American taxpayer took a proverbial bath under the leadership of Mr. Neely, losing more than $1 million under his watch. Now that he’s under ours, we will do everything we can to make sure it never happens again.”

When reached for comment, Kelly spokeswoman Julia Thornton said the congressman “believes career Senior Executive Service officials, who represent some of the highest paid employees within the federal government, should be held to the highest level of accountability,” adding unpaid leave “should be an option for agency heads who are handling cases of significant ethical and potentially criminal violations.”

ARCHIVES

Our sister site Nextgov launches officially today, with a bevvy of stories on the intersection of technology and government. With that launch, it would be proper to take a look back at a couple of the first technology stories appearing in Government Executive magazine and on GovExec.com.

First, April 1995 provided — our digital archives only go back to 1996, so a link is not available — “The Lure of the Web,” a story introducing the World Wide Web to our readers. In it, reporter — and current Editor in Chief — Tom Shoop outlined his experience “logging on” to the web and his thoughts on the future of the technology:

Even with the development of [THOMAS and the Federal Register], much of the Web’s potential for federal users has not yet been realized. But it’s hard to imagine that a research and communications tool this vast and easy to operate won’t find its way to everybody’s desktop in the near future.

It’s important to remember that this was written in 1995, when some members of the current GovExec staff were in elementary school. The web was in its infancy and a lot of our readers were not familiar with the technology. Nearly a year later Rebecca Corbin wrote a longer piece on the upside and pitfalls of the nascent technology. In “Cyberocracy,” she predicted some of the problems illustrated recently during the SOPA fight:

But the road to cybergovernment is not without its potholes. Internet technology is still immature, with many incompatibility problems affecting the interoperability and reliability of systems. Experts continue to debate the best methods for safeguarding data and protecting intellectual property rights on the Web.

Reporter Joseph Marks’ May 2012 magazine profile of federal Chief Information Officer Steven VanRoekel shows just how large and ingrained the web has become in government operations and the day-to-day life of citizens:

[VanRoekel's third phase] includes building internal government mobile apps so that federal workers at animal inspection lots along the U.S.-Mexico border, for example, or at a river contamination site can file reports on their smartphones or tablet instead of trudging back to a field office at the end of each day. It also includes using technology to wrap the complexity of federal government into a cleaner citizen interface. VanRoekel calls this an “outside looking in” perspective.

An early example is the BusinessUSA website, which the federal government launched in a beta testing version in January. The site aims to pull all the forms and information that a small business entrepreneur needs from the government onto a single site so that the government rather than the citizen worries about which form goes where.

Government Executive magazine and Govexec.com have been covering technology since the Internet’s beginnings. With the relaunch of Nextgov, we move forward with the most comprehensive and insightful coverage of technology in government and in the lives of citizens. Although the issues are far more complex than they were 12 years ago — fight over personal Internet usage at work? — Government Executive Media Group remains at the scene.

Prior to joining Government Executive’s online production team, Ross Gianfortune worked at The Washington Post, The Gazette Newspapers, WXRT Radio and The Columbia Missourian. He holds a bachelor’s degree in journalism from University of Missouri and a master’s in communications from American University.

Want to contribute to this story? Share your addition in comments.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Feds give TSP thumbs up

Federal employees’ satisfaction with the Thrift Savings Plan increased in 2011, although officials anticipate the long-awaited rollout next month of the plan’s new Roth 401(k) option will ruffle some feathers.

“Even if we do it perfectly, we will leave some people confused and frustrated,” Greg Long, executive director of the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board, acknowledged during the group’s monthly meeting Monday in its new Capitol Hill office. “I agree that there is potential for a decrease in [user] satisfaction,” he said in response to concerns that the complicated nature of the launch could result in complaints from enrollees until the benefit is fully implemented.

The board is planning an extensive public outreach campaign to educate TSP enrollees about the benefit that will continue far beyond the official May 7 launch date. In addition, the TSP administrator plans to add online and mobile features throughout the summer that will help feds calculate their income and contribution rates. “This does not end with the implementation of Roth on May 7,” said Sophie Dmuchowski, the board’s deputy director of communications.

The Roth offering, which the board has been working on for the past two and a half years, is similar to the one available to private sector employees. It will allow federal employees to invest money that’s already been taxed so it cannot be taxed again upon withdrawal, unlike a traditional TSP investment. Feds can contribute up to $17,000 to the traditional TSP and the Roth option combined in 2012. The Internal Revenue Service announced last fall that the cap on individual TSP contributions in 2012 would increase $500, from $16,500 to $17,000, as a result of the change in the cost-of-living index. Employees 50 and older can contribute an additional $5,500.

Many federal employees interested in taking advantage of the Roth option will have to wait until later this year to do so. Officials have cited complicated and differing pay systems as reasons for the delay. Long said the board couldn’t wait for every agency to be ready to roll out the new benefit at the same time; otherwise the initiative might never have gotten off the ground, he said.

The board on Monday also released the results of its 2011 TSP satisfaction survey, which included more than 8,000 respondents. Eighty-six percent of those surveyed said they were satisfied with the TSP’s competitiveness with other private sector plans, its accessibility, safety and security — a 5 percent increase from the previous survey in 2008. In addition, 54 percent of civilians currently are contributing to their TSP accounts, and Long said it was important to stay focused on engaging the 46 percent who are not squirreling away funds. Seventy-four percent of survey participants who identified themselves as militaryservice members said they currently contribute to TSP accounts. TSP satisfaction on average was higher among older and better paid employees, according to the data. In addition, TSP participation rose slightly among civilian federal employees and service members from February to March, the board reported.

Union officials have argued that recent legislative efforts to increase the amount current federal employees contribute to their defined retirement benefit, or pension, could reduce individual contributions to the TSP. Kim Weaver, director of external affairs, said she has not heard any concerns about that from congressional staff or lawmakers, and the TSP’s current data does not reflect such a trend. It’s on the board’s radar screen, however, she added.

An executive order signed by President Obama on Friday seeks to protect troops and veterans from “aggressive and deceptive” academic recruiters.

The order cites examples of institutions — often for-profit — targeting veterans with serious brain injuries and emotional vulnerabilities without providing academic support and counseling. Vets have been encouraged to take out costly loans instead of federal student loans by institutions that fail to disclose their own, often lacking, merits.

Speaking to troops at Fort Stewart in Hinesville, Ga., Obama said the order “will make life a whole lot more secure for you and your families and our veterans — and a whole lot tougher for those who try to prey on you.”

The initiative requires colleges that recruit military service members, veterans and family to provide clear information about their qualifications as academic institutions and their financial aid offerings. “You’ll be able to get a simple fact sheet called ‘Know Before You Owe,’” Obama said.

Obama also said the initiative will require schools to offer more counseling and to accommodate active-duty students who have to move because of a deployment or reassignment.

It also requires the Defense Department to set stricter rules on how educational institutions can gain access to military installations to keep away recruiters from unqualified and deceptive schools.

“We’re going to bring an end to the aggressive — and sometimes dishonest — recruiting that takes place,” Obama said.

New rules will also apply to online recruiting practices and establish a complaint system for current students or recruitment targets. “Currently, when military and veteran students feel that their school has acted fraudulently, they have no centralized system to file complaints,” a White House announcement said.

Fifty-four senior executives were honored Thursday with the Presidential Distinguished Rank Award.

Together, the top civil servants have saved the government more than $36 billion, according to a review of their accomplishments by the Senior Executives Association.

The Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Agriculture Department received the most awards, with five awardees each.

Small Business Administration director Karen Mills was set to give remarks at the banquet celebrating the awardees, and several agency leaders, including Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and Office of Management and Personnel Director John Berry, planned to attend.

This year’s winners provided legal advice to Treasury Department officials as they crafted legislation to address the banking crisis of 2008, helped coordinate the U.S. response to the earthquake in Haiti, formulated programs for toxic vehicle emissions, protected endangered animals after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, provided the analysis to intercept a decaying satellite in orbit, and accomplished many other achievements.

Distinguished Rank recipients receive a lump-sum payment equal to 35 percent of their annual basic pay and a framed certificate signed by the president, according to the Office of Personnel Management.

The president has honored top feds with rank awards every year since 1978, when the Senior Executive Service was established.

Click here for a complete list of winners.

A memo sent to the Office of Management and Budget supposedly outlining potential staff reductions, obtained by Federal Times, is a “strategic workforce planning” exercise with no bearing on actual staff plans, Interior Department spokesman Adam Fetcher said.

“We regularly undertake strategic workforce planning as part of our ongoing efforts to look at the skills we need to provide services to the American taxpayer in the future,” Fetcher told Government Executive. “There is standing OMB guidance to conduct regular exercises regarding potential future workforce needs and skills gaps and potential areas for reductions, focusing on those achieved through attrition, and such an exercise has been conducted in recent months.”

The memo, which Federal Times published Tuesday, was reported as a potential framework for how to cut seven percent of Interior’s staff. Both Interior and OMB said this was not the case.

According to Interior’s published 2013 budget proposal, the department expects a 0.8 percent workforce reduction (around 590 employees) in the coming year.

“As part of the variety of planning activities that agencies engage in with OMB, Interior conducted a planning exercise, not because we are pursuing such a policy, but in the interest of prudent and responsible management,” OMB spokeswoman Moira Mack told Government Executive. “Our workforce plan for 2013 was published in the President’s Budget and that remains our workforce plan.”

Correction: The original version of this story contained faulty information based on and attributed to a Federal Times report.

The ongoing fight over how much to reimburse contractors for their executive compensation took a new turn on Monday after the White House published a Federal Register notice raising the statutory limit on reimbursable contractor pay to $763,029.

The new cap, a 10 percent hike over the previous limit of $693,951 for the top five employees, was required under a formula set in 1997. “It is this formula, and not any comparable improvement in contractor performance (and the benefits that the taxpayers receive from these contracts), that has resulted in the one-year increase of $70,000,” wrote Lesley Field, acting administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy. Field repeated an earlier controversial proposal from the Obama administration for a much lower reimbursement cap of $200,000, the highest Cabinet salary level.

“By proposing to replace the existing statutory formula with a reimbursement cap that is tied to the salary of a Cabinet official (such as the Secretary of Defense), the president’s plan would bring parity between the amount that the American public pays for the senior executives of the federal government and for the senior executives of those contractors who perform work for the federal government on a cost-reimbursable or other cost-based arrangement,” she wrote.

In response to the higher ceiling, Sens. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, issued a statement reiterating their call for passage of their bill introduced in March to lower the maximum amount taxpayers reimburse all government contractors for their salaries. They would restrict the taxpayer reimbursement for government contractor salaries to the amount of the president’s salary — $400,000 — and extend the cap to all government contractor employees. Their bill would expand on a provision in the National Defense Authorization Act passed in December that extended the federal salary cap to all defense contractor employees, not just the top five.

“At a time when middle-class families are struggling, there’s no justification for a private contractor to receive a taxpayer-funded salary that’s nearly four times what Cabinet secretaries earn,” Boxer said.

A key contractors trade group also weighed in on Monday’s action. The Professional Services Council has long opposed reducing the reimbursement cap for fear of harming the government’s and industry’s ability to access critical skills.

PSC President and Chief Executive Officer Stan Soloway said in a statement, “While we appreciate that OMB has followed the long-standing statutory requirement to set the salary cap based on a formula that assesses average, fair and reasonable compensation for similar positions in the commercial world, it is most disheartening to see the administration continue to advocate for the elimination of the formula in favor of an arbitrary cap tied to federal employee salaries. Under the administration’s proposal, ‘fair and reasonable’ would be replaced by ‘arbitrary’ and the competitive realities of the marketplace for talent will be rendered moot.”

Soloway added the federal pay scale is “one of the most significant barriers to the government’s ability to recruit and retain highly skilled professionals, particularly in the technology-related fields. And since pay parity is unlikely to be dealt with in the near future, all this proposal would do is saddle the government’s contractors — currently its most reliable conduit to such talent — with the same competitive limitations that impede the government.”

A House Republican has stepped up his battle with leaders of the Federal Trade Commission over a year-old plan to move the regulatory agency out of its ornate, 75-year-old headquarters to expand exhibit space for the National Gallery of Art.

On Thursday, House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Rep. John Mica, R-Fla., raised the issue at a meeting with Dan Tangherlini, the General Services Administration’s acting chief. All five FTC commissioners sent a statement Wednesday opposing the move as expensive and wasteful, writing at the invitation of Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., chairman of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government.

Mica and the GSA chief met to discuss more general issues relating to the recent scandal about GSA’s lavish spending on a 2010 Las Vegas training conference.

“We had a productive meeting and discussed some of the challenges facing the GSA,” Mica said in a statement to Government Executive. “We will be working with the acting administrator to ensure the agency operates in a responsible manner. I also briefed him on the pending proposal and request regarding the FTC, and given the GSA’s current circumstances, I agreed to allow more time for the agency to respond to the committee’s request for information.”

On March 8, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee passed a resolution asking GSA for a layout of how FTC employees could be located in 370,000 square feet of space in the privately owned Constitution Center in Southwest Washington, which already houses the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The resolution asks GSA to weigh two proposals for housing FTC; one would move the headquarters and two satellite offices to the Constitution Center and the other would leave one satellite office at its current location on M Street Northwest. It asks GSA to factor in use of the Constitution Center’s common areas, such as its cafeteria, as well as office space for full-time contractors but not interns. It originally gave the beleaguered agency 30 days to comply.

Mica has sought to increase exhibit space for the Art Gallery directly across from FTC’s headquarters at the confluence of Constitution and Pennsylvania avenues, and the Gallery has stated that it could raise private funds to remodel the new space.

The Mica proposal was blasted, as in the past, by all five FTC commissioners — Chairman Jon Leibowitz, J. Thomas Rosch, Edith Ramirez, Julie Brill and Maureen Ohlhausen. “Instead of saving the government money, the proposed transfer would needlessly forfeit a valuable federal building and could initially cost well over $100 million, with substantial additional costs incurred for years to come,” they wrote. “Such an unprecedented giveaway would be contrary to the interests of American taxpayers, especially in this time of fiscal austerity.”

FTC leaders argued the gallery’s intention to raise private funds notwithstanding, taxpayers still would be on the hook for maintenance and operations funding. The said the move alone would cost from $70 million to $83 million, because of the need for “replication of the FTC’s sophisticated Internet and forensic labs, litigation support technology, and premerger filing databases, as well as the agency’s data center.”

They added the move to commercial space and the need to pay rent would deny the Federal Building Fund $6 million and eat into FTC’s appropriation, while opening the possibility of being forced to move yet again in the future. “At a time when all federal agencies face budget cuts,” the commissioners wrote, “the FTC is particularly concerned that the agency might have to bear the wholly unnecessary cost of being moved out of the FTC building and into commercial space.”

Mica’s staff said he is skeptical FTC’s cost-per-square foot estimates for the move are accurate and in line with modern office planning guidelines.

FTC spokesman Peter Kaplan noted the estimated cost for moving the data center alone is $24 million to $34 million, and there would be additional costs for replicating the computer forensic lab, both of which might have an impact on the per-square-foot estimates.

National Gallery spokeswoman Deborah Ziska said, “we’re fully in support of the proposal, but it’s up to Congress.” On the issue of taxpayer funds being required for operations and maintenance, she said this happens on all gallery property, but “we expect that operations and maintenance costs would be fully offset, if we were to move into the new space, by future off-site lease savings.”

Two weeks after President Obama signed the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act, leaders of the Senior Executives Association have written congressional oversight leaders requesting repeal of two provisions requiring federal employees to disclose financial information, calling them “burdensome, complex and, most important, unnecessarily invasive of personal privacy.” At least one recipient has said he is willing to look at the issue more closely.

Carol A. Bonosaro, president of the Senior Executives Association, and William Bransford, SEA general counsel, on April 13 addressed their complaints to the chairmen and ranking members of the House Oversight and Government Reform and the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs committees. They said some of the law’s provisions “are detrimental to career senior executives and, as we had previously warned, these intrusive requirements are already having a chilling effect on the recruitment and retention of career executives,” including those in senior-level and scientific and professional positions.

The STOCK Act seeks to clarify an ambiguity in the 1934 Securities and Exchange Act by prohibiting members of Congress and their staffs from trading on information they obtain from their work that is not available to the general public. During congressional deliberations, its scope was expanded to include some 28,000 federal executives, and SEA has been opposed to it all along.

The letters specifically cited Sections 6 of the law, which requires senior executives to file a report “not later than 30 days after receiving notification of a completed financial transaction,” and 11(b), which requires the Office of Government Ethics “to create a public database of financial disclosure reports filed by executive branch employees.” according to the SEA leaders.

“Senior executives could easily fall afoul of the rule without realizing they have done so,” the letters stated. “Many career senior executives use financial advisers or portfolio managers, because, they, like most Americans, do not have time to monitor the constant gyrations of the modern stock market. If a senior executive does use a financial adviser or portfolio manager, he or she might not get word of individual financial transactions within the 30-day window, or have the ability to receive the necessary information to make reports on individual transactions.”

The requirement for a public database, the executives warned, will violate rights to privacy and pose a risk that “supervisors within a federal agency could be subject to unwarranted personal scrutiny by their subordinates, causing tension and problems in the workplace. Many executives are concerned about the very real possibility of identity theft.”

The law also introduces new requirements for disclosure of information on spouses’ and dependent children’s finances. That information, though not planned to be made available on a public website, could be accessed by members of the public filing a request.

The executives warned that association members have expressed concern the STOCK Act will “jeopardize their ability to plan effectively for retirement.”

Few on Capitol Hill responded to inquiries as to the prospects for repeal. A House staffer noted the original House version did not include provisions covering the federal employees, and the expansion was advanced by Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va. Neither would comment, nor would representatives of most lawmakers to whom the letter was addressed: Reps. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and Elijah Cummings, D-Md., and Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine.

Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, said he “has always been concerned that some provisions applying to the Senior Executive Service may be overly broad, and he is open to closer examination of the problem.”

(Image via SeanPavonePhoto/Shutterstock.com)

Powered by WordPress and Motion by 85ideas.