Tag Archive: executive


An estimate of the latest U.S. Postal Service reform bill to be introduced into the Senate finds that the plan would create a net government loss of $6.3 billion over 10 years.

The Congressional Budget Office released the assessment of the 21st Century Postal Service Act on Jan. 26, as ordered by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. CBO obtained the loss number by calculating that the bill would result in off-budget savings of $25.6 billion through 2022 and on-budget costs of $31.9 billion during the same time period.

Committee chairman Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., introduced the legislation to the Senate on Nov. 2, 2011. The act, among other provisions, would transfer more than $11 billion from the Civil Services Retirement and Disability Fund to the Postal Service Fund to help process the large number of USPS employees set to retire in the next few years, a move that CBO warned “would lead the agency to alter its cost-reduction program by cutting spending less aggressively than it otherwise would and thus increase other expenses relative to current law.”

The legislation also would offer employees additional credit for retirement incentives based on years of service and allow USPS to reduce mail delivery to five days a week within two years of the bill’s enactment, pending evaluation by the Government Accountability Office and approval by the Postal Regulatory Commission.

USPS objected to the bill’s current wording, arguing that it would provide the agency with only two to three years’ worth of funding for operations.

“The bill as currently drafted does not provide the Postal Service with the speed and flexibility it needs to achieve the $20 billion in cost reductions,” Postal Service spokesman David Partenheimer wrote to Government Executive, adding the agency itself seeks authority “to move to five day delivery in January 2013, make needed retail and mail processing network changes without unduly restrictive administrative burdens, and be allowed to operate its own health care plan.“

Partenheimer noted, however, that the Postal Service does support some of the provisions in the legislation, including a requirement that the Office of Personnel Management must return a Federal Employees Retirement System surplus to the agency every year one is calculated.

To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words.
By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable.
Although Government Executive does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to),
it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.

To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words.
By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable.
Although Government Executive does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to),
it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.

Federal executives are wary of the leadership challenges that could accompany the consolidation plan President Obama recently unveiled, according to a new survey.

To better understand the effects of consolidation on the federal workforce, the Government Business Council, the research division of Government Executive, surveyed 130 managers from the six agencies involved in the reorganization — the Commerce Department, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, Export-Import Bank, Overseas Private Investment Corporation, Small Business Administration, and U.S. Trade and Development Agency.

The work of these organizations does overlap, but the level of redundancy may not be so great, according to managers on the inside. Certain business functions are reportedly repeated within each of these agencies, especially through financing and assistance programs, but the organizations agencies do have unique programs as well. Within the six agencies under consideration, only 11 percent of survey respondents believe that more than half of programs overlap.

“The agencies have programs that intercept each other, but the programs are not completely duplicative,” one federal executive said. “They don’t have the same mission, but their missions are part of a whole.”

Obama’s plan would help U.S. businesses succeed, according to more than half the respondents (55 percent). Part of the reorganization plan calls for standing up Business.USA.gov, a federal website to consolidate information and services for entrepreneurs. Many managers discussed the benefits that could come from a clear delineation of programs and regulations.

“The public doesn’t care which agency offers it — just that they can get the needed services,” one manager reported.

While the plan may be good for business, federal managers anticipate difficulties with implementation. During consolidation, 80 percent expect to encounter leadership and management challenges, including morale and employee retention problems.

“These challenges are not new, they will just be highlighted because of the ambitious plan,” explained one federal executive.

Three-fourths of managers say that the federal government’s cultural resistance to change could pose problems for consolidation. Some question whether the reorganization would truly diminish the maze of bureaucratic barriers, or create a new set of problems.

“While the president may have good intentions, anyone who’s been around the federal government for long knows that these initiatives tend to over-promise and under-deliver. Any streamlining would likely take years to fully be enacted,” said one federal executive.

Still others worry about the likelihood of congressional approval, since committee structures and balances of power could change if reorganizations go into effect. Sixty-four percent of business and trade-related managers doubt that Congress will grant reorganization authority.

To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words.
By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable.
Although Government Executive does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to),
it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.

To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words.
By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable.
Although Government Executive does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to),
it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.

President Obama announced Friday that he is seeking authority from Congress to reorganize federal trade and business-related functions in the Commerce Department, the Small Business Administration, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, Overseas Private Investment Corporation, Export-Import Bank and the U.S. Trade and Development Agency.

Is there overlap between these organizations, and will streamlining cut waste?

The Government Business Council, the research division of Government Executive magazine, wants to hear your reaction to this consolidation initiative. This survey should take less than five minutes of your time.

To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words.
By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable.
Although Government Executive does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to),
it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.

The Office of Personnel Management on Friday unveiled a new performance management system for the Senior Executive Service.

Originally slated for completion in September 2011, the system is expected to streamline the way top managers in the federal government are evaluated.

“Under the new system, agencies will be able to rely upon a more consistent and uniform framework to communicate expectations and evaluate the performance of SES members,” OPM Director John Berry wrote in a statement Friday.

“This system focuses, in particular, on the role and responsibility of SES employees to achieve results through effective executive leadership,” Berry said. “The new system will also provide the necessary flexibility and capability for appropriate customization to better meet the needs of all agencies and other federal organizations (e.g., offices of inspectors general).”

The President’s Management Council started a working group in 2010 to examine ways to improve the performance evaluation system for members of the Senior Executive Service. The recommendation to create a standard system came out of that work group.

In a February 2011 memo to members of the Senior Executive Service, Office of Management and Budget Deputy Director for Management Jeffrey Zients and Berry wrote that tight budgets, along with a growing workload, impending retirements and limited opportunities for development were straining the SES workforce.

To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words.
By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable.
Although Government Executive does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to),
it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.

Powered by WordPress and Motion by 85ideas.